Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36435711›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry2023

A Multi-Dimensional Model of Fatigue in Old Age: Implications for Brain Aging.

Feng V Lin

Open access · greenAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Feng V LinDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences(FVL), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 94304; Wu Tsai Neuroscience Institute, Stanford University(FVL), Palo Alto, CA, 94304. Electronic address: vankee_lin@stanford.edu.
Neurosciences Institute · US

Funding

U24 NEW Brain Aging Diversity SupplementU24AG072701 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CONWELL, YEATES, LIN, FENG VANKEE · 2021 to 2024
$2.6M
Develop an ANS-based Personalized Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive ImpairmentR33AG073356 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LIN, FENG VANKEE, TAPPARELLO, CRISTIANO · 2023 to 2025
$2.2M
Develop an ANS-based Personalized Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive ImpairmentR21AG073356 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LIN, FENG VANKEE, TAPPARELLO, CRISTIANO · 2021 to 2023
$476k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG073356NIA NIH HHS R33 AG073356NIA NIH HHS U24 AG072701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the most reported symptom in old age, fatigue is understudied in terms of both mechanisms and measures. Population heterogeneity and methodological inconsistency makes understanding the relationship between fatigue and brain aging challenging. The present article comprehensively reviews existing conceptual and operational frameworks of fatigue, as well as mechanistic heterogeneities of fatigue that exist in the aging literature. Then, I propose a Multi-Dimensional Model of fatigue to provide theoretical cohesion to the study of fatigue in old age, along with a "fatigue circuit" addressing brain profiles across dimensions of fatigue. The potential relationships between fatigue dimensions, the fatigue circuit, and brain aging are discussed to inform the direction of future research.

Indexed as

AgingFatigueBrainHumansbrain agingbrain circuitdimensions of fatigueFatigue

Identifiers

PMID36435711
PMCPMC10653728
OpenAlexW4308310935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.