Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36435360›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2023

Thalamocortical contributions to working memory processes during the n-back task.

Xitong Chen, Evan Sorenson, Kai Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xitong ChenCognitive Control Collaborative, The University of Iowa, 340 Iowa Ave, Iowa City, IA 52242-1407, United States; Department of Psychological and Brain Science, The University of Iowa, 340 Iowa Ave, Iowa City, IA 52242-1407, United States; Iowa Neuroscience Institute, The University of Iowa, 169 Newton Road, 2312, Pappajohn Biomedical Discovery Building, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. Electronic address: xitong-chen@uiowa.edu.
Evan SorensonCognitive Control Collaborative, The University of Iowa, 340 Iowa Ave, Iowa City, IA 52242-1407, United States; Department of Psychological and Brain Science, The University of Iowa, 340 Iowa Ave, Iowa City, IA 52242-1407, United States; Iowa Neuroscience Institute, The University of Iowa, 169 Newton Road, 2312, Pappajohn Biomedical Discovery Building, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Kai HwangCognitive Control Collaborative, The University of Iowa, 340 Iowa Ave, Iowa City, IA 52242-1407, United States; Department of Psychological and Brain Science, The University of Iowa, 340 Iowa Ave, Iowa City, IA 52242-1407, United States; Iowa Neuroscience Institute, The University of Iowa, 169 Newton Road, 2312, Pappajohn Biomedical Discovery Building, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.

Funding

University of Iowa Hawkeye Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (Hawk-IDDRC)P50HD103556 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Lane Strathearn · 2021 to 2026
$8.5M
Cognitive Control Functions of the Human ThalamusR01MH122613 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HWANG, KAI · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103556NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory allows individuals to temporally maintain and manipulate information that is no longer accessible from the sensorium. Whereas prior studies have detailed frontoparietal contributions to working memory processes, less emphasis has been placed on subcortical regions, in particular the human thalamus. The thalamus has a complex anatomy that consists of several distinct nuclei, many of which have dense anatomical connectivity with frontoparietal regions, and thus might play an important yet underspecified role for working memory. The goal of our study is to characterize the detailed functional neuroanatomy of the human thalamus and thalamocortical interactions during the n-back task. To that end, we analyzed an n-back fMRI dataset consisting of 395 subjects from the Human Connectome Project (HCP). We found that thalamic nuclei in the anterior, medial, ventral lateral, and posterior medial thalamus showed stronger evoked responses in response to higher working memory load. Activity in most thalamic nuclei were only modulated by working memory load, but not by categorical membership of the memorized stimuli, suggesting that thalamic function supports domain-general processing for working memory. To determine whether thalamocortical interactions contribute to cortical activity for working memory, we employed an activity flow mapping analysis to test whether thalamocortical interactions can predict cortical task activity patterns. In support, this data-driven thalamocortical interaction model explained a significant amount of variance in the observed cortical activity patterns modulated by working memory load. Our results suggest that the anterior, medial, and posterior medial thalamus, and their associated thalamocortical interactions, contribute to the modulations of distributed cortical activity during working memory.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermThalamusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural PathwaysThalamic NucleiEvoked responseFunctional connectivityThalamocortical interactionThalamusWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID36435360
PMCPMC9805524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.