Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36435088›Full record

ReviewUltrasonics sonochemistry2022

Impact of ultrasound processing on alternative protein systems: Protein extraction, nutritional effects and associated challenges.

Rahel Suchintita Das, Brijesh K Tiwari, Farid Chemat, Marco Garcia-Vaquero

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Nutrients and Bioactive Compounds fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rahel Suchintita DasSection of Food and Nutrition, School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; TEAGASC, Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
Brijesh K TiwariTEAGASC, Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
Farid ChematGREEN Team Extraction, UMR408, INRA, Université D'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse, Avignon Cedex, France.
Marco Garcia-VaqueroSection of Food and Nutrition, School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Electronic address: marco.garciavaquero@ucd.ie.
University College Dublin · IEGroupe de Recherche Clinique en Neuro-urologieTeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins from alternative sources including terrestrial and aquatic plants, microbes and insects are being increasingly explored to combat the dietary, environmental and ethical challenges linked primarily to conventional sources of protein, mainly meat and dairy proteins. Ultrasound (US) technologies have emerged as a clean, green and efficient methods for the extraction of proteins from alternative sources compared to conventional methods. However, the application of US can also lead to modifications of the proteins extracted from alternative sources, including changes in their nutritional quality (protein content, amino acid composition, protein digestibility, anti-nutritional factors) and allergenicity, as well as damage of the compounds associated with an increased degradation resulting from extreme US processing conditions. This work aims to summarise the main advances in US equipment currently available to date, including the main US parameters and their effects on the extraction of protein from alternative sources, as well as the studies available on the effects of US processing on the nutritional value, allergenicity and degradation damage of these alternative protein ingredients. The main research gaps identified in this work and future challenges associated to the widespread application of US and their scale-up to industry operations are also covered in detail.

Indexed as

Evidence GapsAllergenicityDegradationInnovative technologiesNutritional propertiesProtein extraction

Identifiers

PMID36435088
PMCPMC9685360
OpenAlexW4309761890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.