Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36435086›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2022

Impacts of sonication and high hydrostatic pressure on the structural and physicochemical properties of quinoa protein isolate dispersions at acidic, neutral and alkaline pHs.

Lan Luo, Zhi Yang, Haifeng Wang, Muthupandian Ashokkumar, Yacine Hemar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Effect of soybean protein isolate-Food chemistry: X · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Research Progress of Quinoa Seeds (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lan LuoSchool of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand.
Zhi YangSchool of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand. Electronic address: z.yang2@massey.ac.nz.
Haifeng WangCollaborative Innovation Centre of Seafood Deep Processing, Zhejiang Province Joint Key Laboratory of Aquatic Products Processing, Institute of Seafood, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310012, China.
Muthupandian AshokkumarSchool of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Yacine HemarInstitute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China. Electronic address: y.hemar@auckland.ac.nz.
Massey University · NZShenzhen University · CNUniversity of Melbourne · AUZhejiang Gongshang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein, 1 wt% quinoa protein isolate (QPI) was exposed to sonication using a 20 kHz ultrasonicator equipped with a 6 mm horn (14.4 W, 10 mL, up to 15 min) or high hydrostatic pressure (HHP, up to 600 MPa, 15 min) treatments at pH 5, pH 7, and pH 9. The changes to physicochemical properties were probed by SDS-PAGE, FTIR, free sulfhydryl group (SH), surface hydrophobicity (H

Indexed as

Chenopodium quinoaHydrostatic PressureHigh hydrostatic pressurePhysicochemical propertiesQuinoa protein isolatesSonication

Identifiers

PMID36435086
PMCPMC9694062
OpenAlexW4309770220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.