Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434739›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2022

Pharmacokinetic equivalence of CT-P39 and reference omalizumab in healthy individuals: A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, Phase 1 trial.

Marcus Maurer, Sarbjit S Saini, Kristi McLendon, Paul Wabnitz, Sunghyun Kim, Keumyoung Ahn, Suyoung Kim, Sewon Lee, Clive Grattan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04018313 (A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-blind, Three-arm, Parallel Group, Single-dose Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Three Formulations of Omalizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04018313 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-blind, Three-arm, Parallel Group, Single-dose Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Three Formulations of Omalizumab (CT-P39, EU-approved Xolair, and US-licensed Xolair) in Healthy Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorCelltrionRan2020 to 2021Enrolled176ConditionsHealthyArmsCT-P39, EU-approved Xolair, US-licensed Xolair
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. [Advances in targeted therapies for chronic spontaneous urticaria].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Towards Personalised Therapy in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Advancing From Endotype to Clinical Response.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Marcus MaurerInstitute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4121-481X
Sarbjit S SainiJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8522-2742
Kristi McLendonNucleus Network Pty Ltd, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Paul WabnitzcPHARMA Pty Ltd, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0820-9509
Sunghyun KimCelltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Keumyoung AhnCelltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Suyoung KimCelltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Sewon LeeCelltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Clive GrattanSt John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-4351
Celltrion (South Korea) · KRGlobal Virus Network · USGuy's Hospital · GBHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEJohns Hopkins University · USStarpharma (Australia) · AU

Funding

Celltrion, Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCT-P39 is being developed as a biosimilar of reference omalizumab. This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic equivalence of CT-P39 to European Union-approved and United States-licensed reference omalizumab (EU- and US-omalizumab, respectively).

methodsThis two-part, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind Phase 1 trial (NCT04018313) was conducted in healthy individuals with a total immunoglobulin E (IgE) level ≤100  international units (IU)/ml at screening. In part 2, described herein, participants were randomised (1:1:1) to receive a single 150 mg subcutaneous dose of CT-P39, EU-omalizumab, or US-omalizumab. The primary endpoint was pharmacokinetic equivalence in terms of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC

resultsOverall, 146 participants were randomised (CT-P39, N = 47; EU-omalizumab, N = 49; US-omalizumab, N = 50). For all primary pharmacokinetic parameters, 90% CIs for pairwise treatment comparisons were within the 80%-125% equivalence margin, demonstrating pharmacokinetic equivalence. Decreases in free IgE and increases in total IgE serum concentrations were comparable across groups. CT-P39 was well tolerated. Safety endpoints were comparable across groups: there were no treatment-related serious adverse events, deaths, or discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events.

conclusionsCT-P39 was well tolerated and demonstrated pharmacokinetic equivalence with EU-omalizumab and US-omalizumab following administration of a single dose in healthy individuals.

Indexed as

biosimilarCT-P39immunoglobulin Eomalizumabpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID36434739
PMCPMC9665328
OpenAlexW4309112878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.