Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434663›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2022

Timing matters: age-dependent impacts of the social environment and host selection on the avian gut microbiota.

Öncü Maraci, Anna Antonatou-Papaioannou, Sebastian Jünemann, Kathrin Engel, Omar Castillo-Gutiérrez, Tobias Busche, Jörn Kalinowski, Barbara A Caspers

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Öncü MaraciDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. oncu.maraci@uni-bielefeld.de.
Anna Antonatou-PapaioannouEvolutionary Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Sebastian JünemannInstitute for Bio- and Geosciences, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Kathrin EngelDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Omar Castillo-GutiérrezFaculty of Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Tobias BuscheCenter for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Jörn KalinowskiCenter for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Barbara A CaspersDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Bielefeld University · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe establishment of the gut microbiota in early life is a critical process that influences the development and fitness of vertebrates. However, the relative influence of transmission from the early social environment and host selection throughout host ontogeny remains understudied, particularly in avian species. We conducted conspecific and heterospecific cross-fostering experiments in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata domestica) under controlled conditions and repeatedly sampled the faecal microbiota of these birds over the first 3 months of life. We thus documented the development of the gut microbiota and characterised the relative impacts of the early social environment and host selection due to species-specific characteristics and individual genetic backgrounds across ontogeny by using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing.

resultsThe taxonomic composition and community structure of the gut microbiota changed across ontogenetic stages; juvenile zebra finches exhibited higher alpha diversity than adults at the post-breeding stage. Furthermore, in early development, the microbial communities of juveniles raised by conspecific and heterospecific foster parents resembled those of their foster family, emphasising the importance of the social environment. In later stages, the social environment continued to influence the gut microbiota, but host selection increased in importance.

conclusionsWe provided a baseline description of the developmental succession of gut microbiota in zebra finches and Bengalese finches, which is a necessary first step for understanding the impact of the early gut microbiota on host fitness. Furthermore, for the first time in avian species, we showed that the relative strengths of the two forces that shape the establishment and maintenance of the gut microbiota (i.e. host selection and dispersal from the social environment) change during development, with host selection increasing in importance. This finding should be considered when experimentally manipulating the early-life gut microbiota. Our findings also provide new insights into the mechanisms of host selection. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBirdsSocial EnvironmentSpecies SpecificityAvian gut microbiomeBengalese finchEarly developmentEstablishment of the gut microbiotaHost selectionOntogenesisSocial transmissionSuccessionZebra finch

Identifiers

PMID36434663
PMCPMC9700942
OpenAlexW4309990596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.