Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434648›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2022

Noninvasive detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using the methylation signature of circulating tumour DNA.

Huanwen Wu, Shiwei Guo, Xiaoding Liu, Yatong Li, Zhixi Su, Qiye He, Xiaoqian Liu, Zhiwen Zhang, Lianyuan Yu, Xiaohan Shi and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Huanwen Wu *Department of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1, Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Shiwei Guo *Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical, University (the Second Military Medical University), No.168, Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Xiaoding Liu *Department of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1, Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yatong Li *Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1, Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Zhixi Su *Singlera Genomics (Shanghai) Ltd., No. 500, Furonghua Road, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Qiye He *Singlera Genomics (Shanghai) Ltd., No. 500, Furonghua Road, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Xiaoqian LiuDepartment of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1, Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Zhiwen ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1, Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Lianyuan YuDepartment of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1, Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xiaohan ShiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical, University (the Second Military Medical University), No.168, Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Suizhi GaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical, University (the Second Military Medical University), No.168, Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Huan WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical, University (the Second Military Medical University), No.168, Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yaqi PanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical, University (the Second Military Medical University), No.168, Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Chengcheng MaSinglera Genomics (Shanghai) Ltd., No. 500, Furonghua Road, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Rui LiuSinglera Genomics (Shanghai) Ltd., No. 500, Furonghua Road, Shanghai, 201203, China. rliu@singleragenomics.com.
Menghua DaiDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1, Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. daimh@pumch.cn.
Gang JinDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical, University (the Second Military Medical University), No.168, Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China. jingang@smmu.edu.cn.
Zhiyong LiangDepartment of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1, Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. liangzy@pumch.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4787-2925
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNSinotech Genomics (China) · CNSingleron Biotechnologies (china) · CN

Funding

234 Discipline Climbing Plan Project of the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Military Medical University 2019YXK033CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) 2021-I2M-1-002National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-B-061National Key Research and Development Program of China 2019YFC1315800National Key Research and Development Project of China 2017YEFD110300National Key Research and Development Project of China 2019YFC1315904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has the lowest overall survival rate primarily due to the late onset of symptoms and rapid progression. Reliable and accurate tests for early detection are lacking. We aimed to develop a noninvasive test for early PDAC detection by capturing the circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) methylation signature in blood.

methodsGenome-wide methylation profiles were generated from PDAC and nonmalignant tissues and plasma. Methylation haplotype blocks (MHBs) were examined to discover de novo PDAC markers. They were combined with multiple cancer markers and screened for PDAC classification accuracy. The most accurate markers were used to develop PDACatch, a targeted methylation sequencing assay. PDACatch was applied to additional PDAC and healthy plasma cohorts to train, validate and independently test a PDAC-discriminating classifier. Finally, the classifier was compared and integrated with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) to evaluate and maximize its accuracy and utility.

resultsIn total, 90 tissues and 546 plasma samples were collected from 232 PDAC patients, 25 chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients and 323 healthy controls. Among 223 PDAC cases with known stage information, 43/119/38/23 cases were of Stage I/II/III/IV. A total of 171 de novo PDAC-specific markers and 595 multicancer markers were screened for PDAC classification accuracy. The top 185 markers were included in PDACatch, from which a 56-marker classifier for PDAC plasma was trained, validated and independently tested. It achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 in both the validation (31 PDAC, 26 healthy; sensitivity = 84%, specificity = 89%) and independent tests (74 PDAC, 65 healthy; sensitivity = 82%, specificity = 88%). Importantly, the PDACatch classifier detected CA19-9-negative PDAC plasma at sensitivities of 75 and 100% during the validation and independent tests, respectively. It was more sensitive than CA19-9 in detecting Stage I (sensitivity = 80 and 68%, respectively) and early-stage (Stage I-IIa) PDAC (sensitivity = 76 and 70%, respectively). A combinatorial classifier integrating PDACatch and CA19-9 outperformed (AUC=0.94) either PDACatch (0.91) or CA19-9 (0.89) alone (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe PDACatch assay demonstrated high sensitivity for early PDAC plasma, providing potential utility for noninvasive detection of early PDAC and indicating the effectiveness of methylation haplotype analyses in discovering robust cancer markers.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCirculating Tumor DNAPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCase-Control StudiesHumansMethylationBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCirculating Tumor DNACirculating tumour DNA methylationEarly detectionMethylation haplotype blocksPDAC

Identifiers

PMID36434648
PMCPMC9701032
OpenAlexW4310054410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.