Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434639›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2022

Turkish adaptation and validation of revised Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (TR - HSOPSC 2.0).

Emel Filiz, Müjdat Yeşildal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An Exploration of Safety Culture, Second Victim Phenomenon and Negative Work Outcomes in Health Care Settings.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emel FilizDepartment of Healthcare Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Selcuk University, Selçuklu, 42150, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1040-7843
Müjdat YeşildalDepartment of Healthcare Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Selcuk University, Selçuklu, 42150, Konya, Turkey. mujdatyesildal@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1286-903X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study is aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish adaptation of the HSOPSC 2.0 for Turkish hospitals.

methodsThis two-stage psychometric study was conducted with 613 nurses (The response rate of the nurses participated in the study is 72.11%.) at a university hospital between July 2021 and February 2022. In the first stage, the adaptation of the scale was performed. Construct validity was determined at the second stage using confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was tested using the internal consistency coefficient.

resultsThe adaptation results showed that the Turkish version of the scale was adequate for language and content validation. This scale, consisting of 32 items and ten subscales, showed a significantly good fit with the original scale according to confirmatory factor analysis. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the subscales ranged between 0.72 and 0.82.

conclusionsThe Turkish version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture consistently showed acceptable psychometric reliability and validity characteristics.

Indexed as

PsychometricReliabilitySafety cultureTurkishValidity

Identifiers

PMID36434639
PMCPMC9701048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.