Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434537›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Rural urban differences in self-rated health among older adults: examining the role of marital status and living arrangements.

Amiya Saha, Margubur Rahaman, Bittu Mandal, Sourav Biswas, Dipti Govil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Factors associated with self-rated health in Black Canadians: A cross-sectional study.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amiya SahaDepartment of Family & Generations, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, 400088, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8703-8623
Margubur RahamanDepartment of Migration & Urban Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, 400088, India. margubur48@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2403-9033
Bittu MandalSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore, 453552, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8764-4946
Sourav BiswasDepartment of Population & Development, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, 400088, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2715-2704
Dipti GovilDepartment of Family & Generations, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, 400088, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0599-0045
International Institute for Population Sciences · INIndian Institute of Technology Indore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rural-urban gap in socioeconomic and morbidity status among older adults is prevalent in India. These disparities may impact the levels and factors of self-rated health (SRH). The objective of the study is to compare the levels and determinants of SRH between rural and urban areas by considering the moderating effects of marital status and living arrangements. SUBJECTS AND

methodsThe present study used data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) wave 1 (2017-18). A total sample of 30,633 older adults aged 60 years and above were selected for the study. Descriptive statistics, bivariate chi-square test, the interaction effect of living arrangements and marital status, and logistic estimation were applied to accomplish the study objectives.

resultsThe prevalence of poor SRH was found 7% higher in rural areas compared to urban counterparts. A substantial rural-urban disparity in the patterns of poor SRH was also observed. The interaction effect of marital status and living arrangement on self-rated health suggested that older adults who were currently unmarried and living alone were 38% more likely to report poor SRH than those who were currently married and co-residing in rural India. In addition to marital status and living situation, other factors that significantly influenced SRH include age, socio-cultural background (educational attainment and religion), economic background (employment status), health status (ADLs, IADLs, multi-morbidities), and geographic background (region).

conclusionThe present study's findings demonstrated that, notwithstanding local variations, marital status and living circumstances significantly influenced SRH in India. In the present study, unmarried older people living alone were more susceptible to poor SRH in rural areas. The present study supports the importance of reinforcing the concepts of care and support for older individuals. There is a need for special policy attention to older individuals, particularly those unmarried and living alone. Although older individuals had difficulty performing ADLs and IADLs and had multi-morbidities, they reported poorer health. Therefore, offering them social support and top-notch medical assistance is crucial.

Indexed as

Residence CharacteristicsRural PopulationAgedHealth StatusHumansMarital StatusSocial SupportElderlyLiving arrangementsMarital statusRural–urban differenceSelf-rated health

Identifiers

PMID36434537
PMCPMC9700952
OpenAlexW4310054745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.