Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434534›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Measuring the quality of antenatal care in a context of high utilisation: evidence from Telangana, India.

Emma Radovich, Monica Chaudhry, Loveday Penn-Kekana, K Radha Krishnam Raju, Aparajita Mishra, Ramya Vallabhuni, Prashant Jarhyan, Sailesh Mohan, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Oona M R Campbell and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma RadovichFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. emma.radovich@lshtm.ac.uk.
Monica ChaudhryPublic Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Loveday Penn-KekanaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
K Radha Krishnam RajuPublic Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Aparajita MishraPublic Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Ramya VallabhuniPublic Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Prashant JarhyanPublic Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Sailesh MohanPublic Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Dorairaj PrabhakaranPublic Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Oona M R CampbellFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Clara CalvertFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Public Health Foundation of India · INLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India BT/IN/DBT-MRC/DIFD/DP/14/2018-19Medical Research Council MR/R022127/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntenatal care coverage has dramatically increased in many low-and middle-income settings, including in the state of Telangana, India. However, there is increasing evidence of shortfalls in the quality of care women receive during their pregnancies. This study aims to examine dimensions of antenatal care quality in Telangana, India using four primary and secondary data sources.

methodsData from two secondary statewide data sources (National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21; Health Management Information System (HMIS), 2019-20) and two primary data sources (a facility survey in 19 primary health centres and sub-centres in selected districts of Telangana; and observations of 36 antenatal care consultations at these facilities) were descriptively analysed.

resultsNFHS-5 data showed about 73% of women in Telangana received all six assessed antenatal care components during pregnancy. HMIS data showed high coverage of antenatal care visits but differences in levels of screening, with high coverage of haemoglobin tests for anaemia but low coverage of testing for gestational diabetes and syphilis. The facility survey found missing equipment for several key antenatal care services. Antenatal care observations found blood pressure measurement and physical examinations had high coverage and were generally performed correctly. There were substantial deficiencies in symptom checking and communication between the woman and provider. Women were asked if they had any questions in 22% of consultations. Only one woman was asked about her mental health. Counselling of women on at least one of the ten items relating to birth preparedness and on at least one of six danger signs occurred in 58% and 36% of consultations, respectively.

conclusionDespite high coverage of antenatal care services and some essential maternal and foetal assessments, substantial quality gaps remained, particularly in communication between healthcare providers and pregnant women and in availability of key services. Progress towards achieving high quality in both content and experience of antenatal care requires addressing service gaps and developing better measures to capture and improve women's experiences of care.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeoplePrenatal CareFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMalePregnancyQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAntenatal careIndiaMaternity careQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID36434534
PMCPMC9700993
OpenAlexW4310045665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.