ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Optimal radiological gallbladder lesion characterization by combining visual assessment with CT-based radiomics.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive predictive model for incidental gallbladder carcinoma based on multimodal features: Integrating clinical data, MRI radiomics, and deep transfer learning features.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- An integrative deep learning model based on dual-mode ultrasound for diagnosing gallbladder polyps.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Gallbladder disease diagnosis from ultrasound using squeeze-and-excitation capsule network with convolutional bidirectional long short-term memory.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based segmentation of gallbladder cancer on abdominal computed tomography scans: a multicenter study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- An MRI-based model for preoperative prediction of tertiary lymphoid structures in patients with gallbladder cancer.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Update on the Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Prognostication of Gallbladder Cancer.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2025Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in biliary tract cancers.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Review
- The added value of the visual analysis of DWI in post-surgery follow-up of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: do we really need ADC?La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- The Value of Deep Learning in Gallbladder Lesion Characterization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDifferentiating benign gallbladder diseases from gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains a radiological challenge because they can appear very similar on imaging. This study aimed at investigating whether CT-based radiomic features of suspicious gallbladder lesions analyzed by machine learning algorithms could adequately discriminate benign gallbladder disease from GBC. In addition, the added value of machine learning models to radiological visual CT-scan interpretation was assessed.
methodsPatients were retrospectively selected based on confirmed histopathological diagnosis and available contrast-enhanced portal venous phase CT-scan. The radiomic features were extracted from the entire gallbladder, then further analyzed by machine learning classifiers based on Lasso regression, Ridge regression, and XG Boosting. The results of the best-performing classifier were combined with radiological visual CT diagnosis and then compared with radiological visual CT assessment alone.
resultsIn total, 127 patients were included: 83 patients with benign gallbladder lesions and 44 patients with GBC. Among all machine learning classifiers, XG boosting achieved the best AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.72-0.91) and the highest accuracy rate of 73% (95% CI 65-80%). When combining radiological visual interpretation and predictions of the XG boosting classifier, the highest diagnostic performance was achieved with an AUC of 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-1.00), a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI 86-100%), a specificity of 93% (95% CI 90-100%), and an accuracy of 92% (95% CI 90-100%).
conclusionsMachine learning analysis of CT-based radiomic features shows promising results in discriminating benign from malignant gallbladder disease. Combining CT-based radiomic analysis and radiological visual interpretation provided the most optimal strategy for GBC and benign gallbladder disease differentiation. KEY POINTS: Radiomic-based machine learning algorithms are able to differentiate benign gallbladder disease from gallbladder cancer. Combining machine learning algorithms with a radiological visual interpretation of gallbladder lesions at CT increases the specificity, compared to visual interpretation alone, from 73 to 93% and the accuracy from 85 to 92%. Combined use of machine learning algorithms and radiological visual assessment seems the most optimal strategy for GBC and benign gallbladder disease differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36434398What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.