Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434353›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2023

Treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome at onset: a comparison between 8- and 12-week regimens in everyday clinical practice.

Laura Lucchetti, Antonio Gatto, Alessandra Gianviti, Marina Vivarelli, Francesco Emma, Laura Massella

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura LucchettiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatric Subspecialties, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.
Antonio GattoInstitute of Pediatrics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra GianvitiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatric Subspecialties, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.
Marina VivarelliDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatric Subspecialties, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.
Francesco EmmaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatric Subspecialties, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.
Laura MassellaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatric Subspecialties, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy. laura.massella@opbg.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-3965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal steroid treatment at onset of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is still debated. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical outcome at 24 months of follow-up in patients admitted to our unit for the first episode of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome comparing two different steroid regimens.

methodsWe collected data on patients treated from 1992 to 2007 with prednisone according to the International Study on Kidney Diseases in Children 8-week regimen and since 2008 according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Padiatrische Nephrologie 12-week regimen. The primary outcome was to evaluate cumulative prednisone dosage at 12 and 24 months of follow-up in the two groups. As secondary outcomes, we considered mean relapse rate per patient; number of children without relapses at 6, 12, and 24 months; and number of patients who developed frequent relapses and steroid-dependent disease.

resultsData were collected on 127 patients. Sixty-one subjects received the 8-week regimen and 66 the 12-week regimen. The mean cumulative prednisone dose at 12 and 24 months was not different, and the rate of patients without relapses was lower at 6 and 12 months in patients treated with the 8-week course, while no difference was observed at 24 months.

conclusionsDespite the limitations of a retrospective study with limited follow-up, our data indicate that switching treatment from a shorter to a longer scheme did not improve the clinical outcome at 24 months of observation. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Indexed as

Nephrosis, LipoidNephrotic SyndromeChildHumansPrednisoneRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesPrednisoneCumulative prednisone doseRelapseSteroid-sensitive nephrotic syndromeSteroid treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.