ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
Automatic assessment of calcified plaque and nodule by optical coherence tomography adopting deep learning model.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated comprehensive evaluation of coronary artery plaque in IVOCT using deep learning.iScience · 2025Article
- Transformer and Attention-Based Architectures for Segmentation of Coronary Arterial Walls in Intravascular Ultrasound: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become the best imaging tool to assess calcified plaque and nodule. However, every OCT pullback has numerous images, and artificial analysis requires too much time and energy. Thus, it is unsuitable for clinical application. This study aimed to develop and validate an automatic assessment of calcified plaque and nodule by OCT using deep-learning model. The OCT images of calcified plaque and nodule were labeled by two expert readers based on the consensus. A deep-learning model with a MultiScale and MultiTask u-net network (MS-MT u-net) was developed. Then, with the ground truth labeled by expert readers as reference, the diagnostic accuracy and agreement of the model was validated. For the pixelwise evaluation of calcified plaque, the model had a high performance with precision (93.95%), recall (88.95%), and F1 score (91.38%). For the lesion-level evaluation of calcified plaque, the quantitative metrics by the model excellently correlated with the ground truth (calcium score, r = 0.90, p < 0.01; calcified volume, r = 0.99, p < 0.01). For calcified nodules, the model showed excellent diagnostic performance including sensitivity (91.7%), specificity (89.3%), and accuracy (91.0%). We developed a novel deep-learning model to identify the attributes of calcified plaque and nodule. This model provided excellent diagnostic accuracy and agreement with the ground truth, thereby reducing the subjectivity of manual measurements and substantially saving time. These findings can help practitioners efficiently adopt appropriate therapeutic strategies to treat calcified lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36434330What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.