Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434284›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2023

The prognostic implication of visual acuity at the time of uveal melanoma diagnosis.

Elin Asplund, Maria Fili, Tony Pansell, Rune Brautaset, Maria Nilsson, Gustav Stålhammar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elin AsplundDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Unit of Optometry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria FiliDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Unit of Ocular Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tony PansellDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Marianne Bernadotte Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7642-8263
Rune BrautasetDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Unit of Optometry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria NilssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Unit of Optometry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gustav StålhammarDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Unit of Ocular Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. gustav.stalhammar@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-9401-8911
Karolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

Cancerfonden (Swedish Cancer Society) 20 0798 FkKarolinska Institutet (Karolinska Institute) 2021-01131Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (Kungl. Vetenskapsakademien) ME2019-0036Stiftelsen Kronprinsessan Margaretas Arbetsnämnd för Synskadade (Stiftelsen KMA) 157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisual outcomes after primary tumour treatment of uveal melanoma (UM) have been investigated repeatedly. This study evaluates the correlation between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before treatment with clinicopathological factors and patient survival. SUBJECTS/

methodsPre-treatment BCVA was examined in relation to tumour dimensions and location, and survival in a retrospective cohort of 1809 patients who underwent plaque brachytherapy. BCVA was also correlated to tumour histological factors in a second cohort of 137 enucleated eyes.

resultsThe mean BCVA of the tumour eye prior to plaque brachytherapy was LogMAR 0.42 (SD 0.46). Patients with low BCVA (LogMAR ≥ 1.00) did not differ in age (p = 0.19) and had similar frequency of ciliary body involvement (p = 0.99) but had tumours with greater apical thickness (p < 0.0001), greater diameter (p < 0.0001) and shorter distance to the optic disc and fovea (p < 0.0001). There were no significant relations between low BCVA and any of 13 examined tumour histological factors at a Bonferroni-corrected significance level (p > 0.004). Patients with low BCVA had greater incidence of UM-related mortality in competing risk analysis (p = 0.0019) and shorter overall survival (p < 0.0001). Low BCVA was also associated with increased hazard ratio (HR) for UM-related mortality in univariate analysis (HR 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 1.9), but not in multivariate analysis with tumour size and location as covariates.

conclusionsUM patients with low BCVA before primary tumour treatment have a worse prognosis, likely related to increased tumour dimensions. Future studies should examine the prognostic significance of BCVA in relation to macula-involving retinal detachment and genetic factors.

Indexed as

Macula LuteaUveal NeoplasmsHumansMelanomaPrognosisRetrospective StudiesUveal MelanomaVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID36434284
PMCPMC10366190
OpenAlexW4309944599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.