Trial reportSkeletal radiology2023
The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging-based texture analysis in differentiating enchondroma and chondrosarcoma.
Trial report in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The radiomics fingerprint of cartilage tumours: radiomics-based MRI differentiation of enchondroma and atypical cartilaginous tumour.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- A radiology-based differential diagnostic model for pelvic chondrosarcoma using random forest algorithms.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- MRI-based Habitat Analysis for the Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Primary Spinal Tumors.Radiology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Primary Malignant Bone Tumor Imaging: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Quality appraisal of radiomics-based studies on chondrosarcoma using METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS) and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS).Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- A retrospective external validation study of the Birmingham Atypical Cartilage Tumour Imaging Protocol (BACTIP) for the management of solitary central cartilage tumours of the proximal humerus and around the knee.European radiology · 2024Article
- CT and MRI radiomics of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas: an updated systematic review of reproducibility and validation strategies.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Radiomics Texture Analysis of Bone Marrow Alterations in MRI Knee Examinations.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- SPECT/CT Radiomics for Differentiating between Enchondroma and Grade I Chondrosarcoma.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the diagnostic performance of MRI-based texture analysis for differentiating enchondromas and chondrosarcomas, especially on fat-suppressed proton density (FS-PD) images. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe whole tumor volumes of 23 chondrosarcomas and 24 enchondromas were manually segmented on both FS-PD and T1-weighted images. A total of 861 radiomic features were extracted. SelectKBest was used to select the features. The data were randomly split into training (n = 36) and test (n = 10) for T1-weighted and training (n = 37) and test (n = 10) for FS-PD datasets. Fivefold cross-validation was performed. Fifteen machine learning models were created using the training set. The best models for T1-weighted, FS-PD, and T1-weighted + FS-PD images were selected in terms of accuracy and area under the curve (AUC).
resultsThere were 7 men and 16 women in the chondrosarcoma group (mean ± standard deviation age, 45.65 ± 11.24) and 7 men and 17 women in the enchondroma group (mean ± standard deviation age, 46.17 ± 11.79). Naive Bayes was the best model for accuracy and AUC for T1-weighted images (AUC = 0.76, accuracy = 80%, recall = 80%, precision = 80%, F1 score = 80%). The best model for FS-PD images was the K neighbors classifier for accuracy and AUC (AUC = 1.00, accuracy = 80%, recall = 80%, precision = 100%, F1 score = 89%). The best model for T1-weighted + FS-PD images was logistic regression for accuracy and AUC (AUC = 0.84, accuracy = 80%, recall = 60%, precision = 100%, F1 score = 75%).
conclusionMRI-based machine learning models have promising results in the discrimination of enchondroma and chondrosarcoma based on radiomic features obtained from both FS-PD and T1-weighted images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36434265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.