Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434167›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue banking2023

Graft dislocation following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a comparative cohort analysis of Optisol GS and organ culture preserved corneas.

André S Pollmann, Jayme R Vianna, Stanley P George, Christopher D Seamone, Elsie Chan, Darrell R Lewis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

André S PollmannDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, 1276 South Park Street, Room 2035D, 2 West Victoria Building, Halifax, NS, B3H 2Y9, Canada. andre.p@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4504-394X
Jayme R ViannaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, 1276 South Park Street, Room 2035D, 2 West Victoria Building, Halifax, NS, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Stanley P GeorgeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, 1276 South Park Street, Room 2035D, 2 West Victoria Building, Halifax, NS, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Christopher D SeamoneDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, 1276 South Park Street, Room 2035D, 2 West Victoria Building, Halifax, NS, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Elsie ChanRoyal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Darrell R LewisDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, 1276 South Park Street, Room 2035D, 2 West Victoria Building, Halifax, NS, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAThe Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested risk factors for graft dislocation after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). We aimed to investigate the influence of eye bank storage solution as a risk factor for graft dislocation, as this could have significant implications for eye banking practices. This retrospective analysis compared cohorts from the QEII Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Canada (donor corneas preserved in Optisol GS) and the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (donor corneas preserved in organ culture). Patient, surgical, and post-operative data were collected for consecutive DSAEK surgeries performed between 2012 and 2020. Risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling. 654 DSAEK surgeries were performed during the study period: 271 in the Optisol GS storage cohort and 383 in the organ culture cohort. The most common indications were pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, and failed previous DSAEK. The incidence of graft dislocation requiring surgical repositioning was 9.6% (n = 26) in the Optisol GS cohort and 12.0% (n = 46) in the organ culture cohort (OR, 0.50, 95% CI, 0.20-1.13). Development of graft dislocation was associated with intraoperative venting incisions (OR, 2.50, 95% CI, 1.12-5.51) and a post-operative wound leak (OR, 55.24, 95% CI, 10.20-514.85). The incidence of DSAEK dislocation was similar between study sites using Optisol GS and organ culture, suggesting changes in eye bank storage solution would not mitigate this post-operative complication. Intraoperative creation of venting incisions and post-operative wound leaks and were factors associated with graft dislocation.

Indexed as

Corneal TransplantationDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyChondroitin SulfatesComplex MixturesCorneaDextransEndothelium, CornealGentamicinsGraft SurvivalHumansOrgan Culture TechniquesRetrospective StudiesChondroitin SulfatesComplex MixturesDextransGentamicinsOptisolDescemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)Eye bankingGraft dislocationOptisol GSOrgan culture medium

Identifiers

PMID36434167
OpenAlexW4310081330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.