Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434154›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2023

Dual [

David L Chan, Aimee R Hayes, Ioannis Karfis, Alice Conner, Luke Furtado O'Mahony, Magdalena Mileva, Elizabeth Bernard, Paul Roach, Gwennaëlle Marin, Nick Pavlakis and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical performance of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prognostic value of the dual-tracer PET score (NETPET) in neuroendocrine tumors with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical research analysis of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The prognostic effect of dualBMC gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  10. PET in myeloma redefined: a comparative imaging study with FDG and fluorocholine PET/CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

David L Chan *Medical Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. david.chan@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7773-3144
Aimee R Hayes *Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Ioannis KarfisNuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Alice ConnerFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1313-1582
Luke Furtado O'MahonyUniversity College London Medical School, University College London, London, UK.
Magdalena MilevaNuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Elizabeth BernardNuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Paul RoachNuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Gwennaëlle MarinNuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Nick PavlakisMedical Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Geoffrey SchembriNuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Gopinath GnanasegaranNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Clementine MarinNuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Bruno VanderlindenMedical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Shaunak NavalkissoorNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Martyn E CaplinNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Patrick FlamenNuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Christos ToumpanakisNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Dale L BaileyMedical Oncology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEThe Royal Free Hospital · GBThe University of Sydney · AURoyal North Shore Hospital · AUUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEPNENs) are heterogeneous in clinical course, biology, and outcomes. The NETPET score predicts survival by scoring uptake on dual [

methodsDual scans were assigned a NETPET score of P1 (DOTATATE positive/FDG negative), P2-4 (DOTATATE positive/FDG positive), or P5 (DOTATATE negative/FDG positive). NETPET score, histological grade, age at diagnosis, and presence/absence of extrahepatic disease were compared to overall survival/time to progression on univariate and multivariate analysis.

results319 metastatic/unresectable GEPNEN patients were included. The NETPET score was significantly associated with overall survival and time to progression on univariate and multivariate analysis (all p < 0.01). Median overall survival/time to progression was 101.8/25.5 months for P1, 46.5/16.7 months for P2-4, and 11.5/6.6 months for P5. Histological grade correlated with overall survival and time to progression on univariate and multivariate analysis (all p < 0.01), while presence/absence of extrahepatic disease did not. Age at diagnosis correlated with overall survival on univariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.01). The NETPET score also correlated with histological grade (p < 0.001).

conclusionThis study validates the NETPET score as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic GEPNENs, capturing the complexity of dual PET imaging.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsOrganometallic CompoundsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Gallium RadioisotopesHumansPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadionuclide Imagingcopper dotatate CU-64Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Gallium RadioisotopesOrganometallic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID36434154
PMCPMC9938218
OpenAlexW4310058918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.