Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434142›Full record

Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

Five-year follow-up of corneal endothelial cell density after transscleral ab interno glaucoma gel stent implantation.

Markus Lenzhofer, Armin Motaabbed, Hans Peter Colvin, Melchior Hohensinn, Veit Steiner, Wolfgang Hitzl, Christian Runge, Sarah Moussa, Herbert A Reitsamer

Full text readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Is It Here to Stay?Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Markus LenzhoferDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. m.lenzhofer@salk.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5299-7330
Armin MotaabbedDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Hans Peter ColvinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Melchior HohensinnDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Veit SteinerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Wolfgang HitzlDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Christian RungeResearch Program Experimental Ophthalmology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Sarah MoussaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Herbert A ReitsamerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigates the course of the endothelial cell density over a period of 5 years after XEN45 implantation (XEN45µm, Allergan Plc., USA) with or without combined cataract surgery.

methodsThis is a prospective, cross-sectional, monocentric, non-randomized clinical trial with the intention to treat a population of the University Eye Clinic Glaucoma Service Salzburg. One hundred and fifty-five eyes with preoperative central corneal endothelial cell counts were subjected to XEN45 implantation with (combined surgery group) or without (solo surgery group) combined cataract surgery. Endothelial cell density was measured at 3 corneal positions. XEN45 location parameters were determined with anterior segment OCT and gonioscopy.

resultsIn the combined surgery group, a significant reduction of central endothelial cell count was found at years 2 and 4 when compared to baseline (p = 0.001 and p = 0.02, n = 86), whereas at years 1, 3, and 5, no change was detected (all p > 0.09). The median reduction of endothelial cell count was - 79 (95% CI: - 183 to - 9) and - 93 (95% CI: - 220 to 23) cells at years 2 and 4, respectively. In the solo surgery group (n = 69), no significant change in endothelial cell counts was detected at any time during the 5-year evaluation period (all p > 0.07). Explorative data analyses revealed that XEN45 location parameters did not significantly influence the course of endothelial cell count over time.

conclusionsEndothelial cell loss after XEN45 implantation seems to be low. The present data suggest no impact on the position of the implant with regard to central endothelial cell counts in this study.

Indexed as

CataractGlaucomaGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsGlaucoma, Open-AngleCorneaCross-Sectional StudiesEndothelial CellsFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntraocular PressureProspective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeEndothelial cell countEndothelial cell densityMIGSXENXEN Glaucoma Gel Microstent

Identifiers

PMID36434142
PMCPMC10049927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read153
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.