Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434070›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Contrast phase recognition in liver computer tomography using deep learning.

Bruno Aragão Rocha, Lorena Carneiro Ferreira, Luis Gustavo Rocha Vianna, Luma Gallacio Gomes Ferreira, Ana Claudia Martins Ciconelle, Alex Da Silva Noronha, João Martins Cortez Filho, Lucas Salume Lima Nogueira, Jean Michel Rocha Sampaio Leite, Maurício Ricardo Moreira da Silva Filho and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bruno Aragão RochaInRad, Institute of Radiology, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil. bruno@machiron.com.br.
Lorena Carneiro FerreiraInRad, Institute of Radiology, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil.
Luis Gustavo Rocha Vianna *Machiron Ltd., Rua Capote Valente, 671, São Paulo, 05409-002, Brazil.
Luma Gallacio Gomes Ferreira *Machiron Ltd., Rua Capote Valente, 671, São Paulo, 05409-002, Brazil.
Ana Claudia Martins CiconelleMachiron Ltd., Rua Capote Valente, 671, São Paulo, 05409-002, Brazil.
Alex Da Silva NoronhaMachiron Ltd., Rua Capote Valente, 671, São Paulo, 05409-002, Brazil.
João Martins Cortez FilhoDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine (FMUSP), Hospital das Clínicas (HCFMUSP), Rua Dr. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar, 225, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Lucas Salume Lima NogueiraDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine (FMUSP), Hospital das Clínicas (HCFMUSP), Rua Dr. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar, 225, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Jean Michel Rocha Sampaio LeiteMachiron Ltd., Rua Capote Valente, 671, São Paulo, 05409-002, Brazil.
Maurício Ricardo Moreira da Silva FilhoInRad, Institute of Radiology, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil.
Claudia da Costa LeiteInRad, Institute of Radiology, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil.
Marcelo de Maria FelixInRad, Institute of Radiology, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil.
Marco Antônio GutierrezInformatics Department, The Heart Institute, Hospital das Clínicas (HCFMUSP), University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar 44, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Cesar Higa NomuraInRad, Institute of Radiology, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil.
Giovanni Guido CerriInRad, Institute of Radiology, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil.
Flair José CarrilhoDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine (FMUSP), Hospital das Clínicas (HCFMUSP), Rua Dr. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar, 225, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Suzane Kioko OnoDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo, School of Medicine (FMUSP), Hospital das Clínicas (HCFMUSP), Rua Dr. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar, 225, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico PQ 304409/2021-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/05723-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become the 4th leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with high social, economical and health implications. Imaging techniques such as multiphase computed tomography (CT) have been successfully used for diagnosis of liver tumors such as HCC in a feasible and accurate way and its interpretation relies mainly on comparing the appearance of the lesions in the different contrast phases of the exam. Recently, some researchers have been dedicated to the development of tools based on machine learning (ML) algorithms, especially by deep learning techniques, to improve the diagnosis of liver lesions in imaging exams. However, the lack of standardization in the naming of the CT contrast phases in the DICOM metadata is a problem for real-life deployment of machine learning tools. Therefore, it is important to correctly identify the exam phase based only on the image and not on the exam metadata, which is unreliable. Motivated by this problem, we successfully created an annotation platform and implemented a convolutional neural network (CNN) to automatically identify the CT scan phases in the HCFMUSP database in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. We improved this algorithm with hyperparameter tuning and evaluated it with cross validation methods. Comparing its predictions with the radiologists annotation, it achieved an accuracy of 94.6%, 98% and 100% in the testing dataset for the slice, volume and exam evaluation, respectively.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularDeep LearningLiver NeoplasmsBrazilComputersHumansTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID36434070
PMCPMC9700820
OpenAlexW4310011594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.