Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434044›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Feasibility of using breath sampling of non-volatiles to estimate the prevalence of illicit drug use among nightlife attendees.

Kristin Feltmann, Tobias H Elgán, Michael Böttcher, Stefan Lierheimer, Sigurd Hermansson, Olof Beck, Johanna Gripenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristin FeltmannSTAD, Stockholm Prevents Alcohol and Drug Problems, Stockholm, Sweden. Kristin.Feltmann@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-4928-9111
Tobias H ElgánSTAD, Stockholm Prevents Alcohol and Drug Problems, Stockholm, Sweden.
Michael BöttcherMVZ Medizinische Labore Dessau Kassel GmbH, Dessau-Roßlau, Germany.
Stefan LierheimerMVZ Medizinische Labore Dessau Kassel GmbH, Dessau-Roßlau, Germany.
Sigurd HermanssonWaters Sverige AB, Solna, Sweden.
Olof BeckCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Norra Stationsgatan 69, plan 7, 11364, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johanna GripenbergSTAD, Stockholm Prevents Alcohol and Drug Problems, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare 2016-07352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of drug use among nightlife attendees needs to be accurately estimated to, for example, evaluate preventive interventions. This study tested the feasibility of using a breath-sampling device to estimate the prevalence of drug use among nightlife attendees. The study was conducted at five nightclubs and a large music festival in Stockholm, Sweden. Participants were invited to participate and microparticles in exhaled breath were sampled and analyzed for 47 compounds using a state-of-the-art analytic method that follows forensic standards. In addition, participants' breath alcohol concentration was measured and they were interviewed about demographics, drinking habits, and drug use. Of the people invited, 73.7% (n = 1223) agreed to participate, and breath samples were collected from 1204 participants. Breath sampling was fast and well-accepted by participants. 13 percent of participants tested positive for an illicit drug, but only 4.3% self-reported drug use during the last 48 h. The most common substances detected were cocaine, amphetamine, and MDMA. There was no agreement between self-reported and measured use of any drug. Breath sampling is a convenient method to test illicit drug use among a large number of participants at events, and can be used as an estimate of drug use prevalence.

Indexed as

Body FluidsIllicit DrugsSubstance-Related DisordersFeasibility StudiesHumansPrevalenceIllicit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID36434044
PMCPMC9700783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.