Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434012›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Global landscape of replicative DNA polymerase usage in the human genome.

Eri Koyanagi, Yoko Kakimoto, Tamiko Minamisawa, Fumiya Yoshifuji, Toyoaki Natsume, Atsushi Higashitani, Tomoo Ogi, Antony M Carr, Masato T Kanemaki, Yasukazu Daigaku

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Eri Koyanagi *Frontier Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Yoko Kakimoto *Frontier Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Tamiko Minamisawa *Cancer Genome Dynamics project, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumiya Yoshifuji *Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Toyoaki NatsumeNational Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems (ROIS), Mishima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3544-4491
Atsushi HigashitaniGraduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6920-0594
Tomoo OgiResearch Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5492-9072
Antony M CarrGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9RQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2028-2389
Masato T KanemakiNational Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems (ROIS), Mishima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7657-1649
Yasukazu DaigakuFrontier Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. yasukazu.daigaku@jfcr.or.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-8404-7492
Tohoku University · JPNational Institute of Genetics · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPNagoya University · JPUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 110047/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The division of labour among DNA polymerase underlies the accuracy and efficiency of replication. However, the roles of replicative polymerases have not been directly established in human cells. We developed polymerase usage sequencing (Pu-seq) in HCT116 cells and mapped Polε and Polα usage genome wide. The polymerase usage profiles show Polε synthesises the leading strand and Polα contributes mainly to lagging strand synthesis. Combining the Polε and Polα profiles, we accurately predict the genome-wide pattern of fork directionality plus zones of replication initiation and termination. We confirm that transcriptional activity contributes to the pattern of initiation and termination and, by separately analysing the effect of transcription on co-directional and converging forks, demonstrate that coupled DNA synthesis of leading and lagging strands is compromised by transcription in both co-directional and convergent forks. Polymerase uncoupling is particularly evident in the vicinity of large genes, including the two most unstable common fragile sites, FRA3B and FRA3D, thus linking transcription-induced polymerase uncoupling to chromosomal instability. Together, our result demonstrated that Pu-seq in human cells provides a powerful and straightforward methodology to explore DNA polymerase usage and replication fork dynamics.

Indexed as

DNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseGenome, HumanDNA ReplicationHumansDNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID36434012
PMCPMC9700718
OpenAlexW4310058952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.