Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36434000›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Low-dose AAV-CRISPR-mediated liver-specific knock-in restored hemostasis in neonatal hemophilia B mice with subtle antibody response.

Xiangjun He, Zhenjie Zhang, Junyi Xue, Yaofeng Wang, Siqi Zhang, Junkang Wei, Chenzi Zhang, Jue Wang, Brian Anugerah Urip, Chun Christopher Ngan and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advancements in CRISPR-basedFrontiers in genome editing · 2026
    Review
  4. AAV-mediated gene therapy for the CNS: The case for early treatment.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  5. Peeling back the layers of immunogenicity in Cas9-based genomic medicine.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical perspective: Advancing hemophilia treatment through gene therapy approaches.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. CRISPR and gene editing technologies for bleeding disorders.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Targeted Gene Insertion: The Cutting Edge of CRISPR Drug Development with Hemophilia as a Highlight.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  17. Frontiers in genome editing · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiangjun He *School of Biomedical Sciences, MOE Key Lab, Faculty of Medicine; Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Zhenjie Zhang *School of Biomedical Sciences, MOE Key Lab, Faculty of Medicine; Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Junyi XueSchool of Biomedical Sciences, MOE Key Lab, Faculty of Medicine; Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yaofeng WangCentre for Regenerative Medicine and Health, Hong Kong Institute of Science & Innovation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5554-8661
Siqi ZhangSchool of Biomedical Sciences, MOE Key Lab, Faculty of Medicine; Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Junkang WeiSchool of Biomedical Sciences, MOE Key Lab, Faculty of Medicine; Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chenzi ZhangSchool of Biomedical Sciences, MOE Key Lab, Faculty of Medicine; Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jue WangSchool of Biomedical Sciences, MOE Key Lab, Faculty of Medicine; Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Brian Anugerah UripSchool of Biomedical Sciences, MOE Key Lab, Faculty of Medicine; Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chun Christopher NganSchool of Biomedical Sciences, MOE Key Lab, Faculty of Medicine; Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Junjiang SunDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Yuefeng LiGuangdong Landau Biotechnology Co.Ltd, Guangzhou, 510555, China.
Zhiqian LuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Hui ZhaoSchool of Biomedical Sciences, MOE Key Lab, Faculty of Medicine; Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8160-6415
Duanqing PeiCentre for Regenerative Medicine and Health, Hong Kong Institute of Science & Innovation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5222-014X
Chi-Kong LiDepartment of Pediatrics, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2810-5758
Bo FengSchool of Biomedical Sciences, MOE Key Lab, Faculty of Medicine; Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. fengbo@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-4018-3257
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKChinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AAV-delivered CRISPR/Cas9 (AAV-CRISPR) has shown promising potentials in preclinical models to efficiently insert therapeutic gene sequences in somatic tissues. However, the AAV input doses required were prohibitively high and posed serious risk of toxicity. Here, we performed AAV-CRISPR mediated homology-independent knock-in at a new target site in mAlb 3'UTR and demonstrated that single dose of AAVs enabled long-term integration and expression of hF9 transgene in both adult and neonatal hemophilia B mice (mF9 -/-), yielding high levels of circulating human Factor IX (hFIX) and stable hemostasis restoration during entire 48-week observation period. Furthermore, we achieved hemostasis correction with a significantly lower AAV dose (2 × 10

Indexed as

Hemophilia BAnimalsAntibody FormationCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic VectorsHemostasisHumansLiverMice

Identifiers

PMID36434000
PMCPMC9700734
OpenAlexW4310060711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.