ArticleScientific reports2022
Factors influencing compliance in RRD patients with the face-down position via grounded theory approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Grounded theory-KANO model for optimising peri-urban rural housing design.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Involving Patients in Developing a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Retinal Detachment.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Readiness for Hospital Discharge and Associated Factors Among Adult Ophthalmic Day Surgery Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Retinal detachment.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted management of retinal detachment from ultra-widefield fundus images based on weakly-supervised approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) require face-down positioning (FDP) for 3-6 months or longer after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with silicone oil (SO) tamponade. This paper aimed to identify the factors that influenced FDP compliance. This study adopted semi-structured interviews with patients who require FDP after SO tamponade. Constructivist grounded theory was utilized in this study. The qualitative data was analyzed and coded via NVivo 11.0 through open coding, axial coding and selective coding. Twenty-four RRD patients were involved. The interviews yielded five main themes that defined home FDP compliance were identified: posture discomfort, doctor-patient communication, psychological factors, occupational character, and family factors. A theoretical model of the influencing factors of postural compliance of FDP was constructed based on the interview analysis. A variety of factors can affect FDP conformity. We can increase compliance of RRD patients by enhancing comfort, encouraging doctor-patient communication, providing comprehensive care, promoting community-based intervention, and strengthening family education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.