Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36433897›Full record

ArticleMusculoskeletal care2023

Development of a booster intervention for graded sensorimotor retraining (RESOLVE) in people with persistent low back pain: A nested, randomised, feasibility trial.

Edel T O'Hagan, Aidan G Cashin, Rodrigo R N Rizzo, Hayley B Leake, Pauline Zahara, Matthew K Bagg, Benedict M Wand, James H McAuley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Musculoskeletal care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Edel T O'HaganCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1914-5918
Aidan G CashinCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4190-7912
Rodrigo R N RizzoCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Hayley B LeakeCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Pauline ZaharaCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Matthew K BaggCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Benedict M WandFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Midwifery and Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
James H McAuleyCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
New South Wales Department of Health · AUCurtin University · AUNeuroscience Research Australia · AUThe University of Notre Dame Australia · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLow back pain contributes to an increasing global health burden exacerbated by unsustained improvements from current treatments. There is a need to develop, and test interventions to maintain initial improvements from low back pain treatments. One option is to implement a booster intervention. This study aimed to develop and test the feasibility of implementing a booster intervention delivered remotely to supplement the benefits from a complex intervention for chronic low back pain.

methodThis study was nested in the RESOLVE trial. The booster intervention was developed by an expert group, including a clinical psychologist, exercise physiologist and physiotherapists, and based on a motivational interviewing framework. We developed a conversational flow chart to support the clinician to guide participants towards achieving their pre-specified personal goals and future low back pain self-management. Participants with chronic low back pain who were aged over 18 years and fluent in English were recruited. The booster intervention was delivered in one session, remotely, by telephone. The intervention was considered feasible if: participants were able to be contacted or <3 contacts were necessary to arrange the booster session; there were sufficient willing participants (<15% of sample unwilling to participate); and participants and research clinicians reported a perceived benefit of >7/10.

resultsFifty participants with chronic non-specific low back pain were recruited to test the feasibility of implementing the booster intervention. Less than three contact attempts were necessary to arrange the booster session, only one participant declined to participate. Participants perceived the session to be beneficial; on a 0 to 10 scale of perceived benefit, the average score recorded was 8.3 (SD 2.0). Clinicians also reported a moderate perceived benefit to the participant; the average score recorded by clinicians was 6.3 (SD 1.6).

conclusionWe developed a step by step, simple booster intervention that was perceived to be beneficial to participants with chronic low back pain. The booster can feasibly be delivered remotely following a complex intervention.

Indexed as

Low Back PainSelf-ManagementAdultExerciseExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesHumansMiddle Agedback careboostercomplex interventionslow back painself-management

Identifiers

PMID36433897
PMCPMC10946532
OpenAlexW4309990737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.