Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36433760›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Cervical Cancer-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices and Self-Screening Acceptance Among Patients, Employees, and Social Media Followers of Major Brazilian Hospital.

Luiza Perez, Kimberley Tran, Vanessa Alvarenga-Bezerra, Diya Chadha, Libby Dotson, Fernanda Assir, Eduardo Cordioli, Mariano Tamura Vieira Gomes, Sergio Podgaec, Agnaldo Lopes da Silva-Filho and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Luiza Perez12295Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3710-380X
Kimberley Tran6740Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Vanessa Alvarenga-Bezerra37896Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2436-5939
Diya Chadha3065Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Libby Dotson3065Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Fernanda Assir37896Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Cordioli37896Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5405-9380
Mariano Tamura Vieira Gomes37896Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4719-4311
Sergio Podgaec37896Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9760-6003
Agnaldo Lopes da Silva-Filho28114Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8486-7861
Nimmi Ramanujam3065Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7319-8415
Renato Moretti-Marques37896Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9997-6668
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRDuke University · USCornell University · USPrinceton University · USUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

Novel see and treat strategies for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settingsR01CA239268 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KATZ, DAVID FRANK, RAMANUJAM, NIRMALA · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrazil has a high burden of cervical cancer, even though it is preventable, traceable and treatable. Hence, this study evaluated levels of knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) related to cervical cancer screening and diagnosis and acceptance of self-screening techniques among women aged 24 and greater.

methodsA cross-sectional KAP survey was administered to n = 4206 women and spanned questions relating to cervical cancer, HPV, speculum, Pap test and colposcopy. Questionnaire was disseminated through a major hospital's social media platforms, intranet and gynecologic-oncology clinics. Logistic regressions evaluated associations between sociodemographic characteristics and knowledge, attitudes, and preventative behaviors against cervical cancer. Participants indicated willingness to try DNA-HPV self-sampling and cervix self-visualization (self-colposcopy).

findingsParticipants were mostly white individuals (70.5%) with higher education and from social classes A and B. They demonstrated superior levels of KAP than described in the literature, with over 57.8% having answered 80+% of questions correctly. KAP scores were predicted by social class, educational attainment, race, history of premalignant cervical lesions and geographic location. About 80% and 63% would be willing to try DNA-HPV self-sampling and cervix self-visualization, respectively. Interest in self-screening was associated with adequate attitude (OR = 1.85) and inadequate practice (OR = .83).

interpretationAdequate KAP are fundamental for the successful implementation of a self-screening program. Participants were interested in methods that provide them with greater autonomy, control and practicality. Self-screening could address barriers for under-screened women such as shame, discomfort, distance from clinics and competing commitments, enabling Brazil to reach the WHO's cervical cancer elimination goals. It could also decrease excess medical intervention in over-screened populations by promoting shared decision-making.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsSocial MediaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBrazilCervix UteriCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospitalsHumanscancer detectioncancer preventioncancer screeningcervical cancercervical cancer awarenesshuman papillomavirus

Identifiers

PMID36433760
PMCPMC9703545
OpenAlexW4310460669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.