Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36433598›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Treatment of Extended Kalman Filter Implementations for the Gyroless Star Tracker.

Joshua J R Critchley-Marrows, Xiaofeng Wu, Iver H Cairns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimal Finite Difference Angular Velocity Estimation for Spacecraft.The journal of the astronautical sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua J R Critchley-MarrowsSchool of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2040, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3820-8603
Xiaofeng WuSchool of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2040, Australia.
Iver H CairnsSchool of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2040, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6978-9765

Funding

Australian Research Council ARC Training Centre for CubeSats, UAVs and their ApplicationsUniversity of Sydney Research Training Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The literature since Apollo contains exhaustive material on attitude filtering, usually treating the problem of two sensors, a combination of state measuring and inertial devices. More recently, it has become popular for a sole attitude determination device to be considered. This is especially the case for a star tracker given its unbiased stellar measurement and recent improvements in optical sensor performance. The state device indirectly estimates the attitude rate using a known dynamic model. In estimation theory, two main attitude filtering approaches are classified, the additive and the multiplicative. Each refers to the nature of the quaternion update in the filter. In this article, these two techniques are implemented for the case of a sole star tracker, using simulated and real night sky image data. Both sets of results are presented and compared with each other, with a baseline established through a basic linear least square estimate. The state approach is more accurate and precise for measuring angular velocity than using the error-based filter. However, no discernible difference is observed between each technique for determining pointing. These results are important not only for sole device attitude determination systems, but also for space situational awareness object localisation, where attitude and rate estimate accuracy are highly important.

Indexed as

attitudeKalman FilterSSAstar trackerStatic Attitude Estimation

Identifiers

PMID36433598
PMCPMC9693323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.