Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36433597›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Feedback Regimes of LFI Sensors: Experimental Investigations.

Karl Bertling, Xiaoqiong Qi, Thomas Taimre, Yah Leng Lim, Aleksandar D Rakić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. TerahertzAPL bioengineering · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Laser Optical Feedback Turns 60.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karl BertlingSchool of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1087-2315
Xiaoqiong QiSchool of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3354-535X
Thomas TaimreSchool of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4470-7668
Yah Leng LimSchool of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3484-045X
Aleksandar D RakićSchool of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4615-2240

Funding

Australian Research Council DP200101948Australian Research Council DP210103342Queensland Government Advance Queensland Industry Research Fellowships program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we revisit the concept of optical feedback regimes in diode lasers and explore each regime experimentally from a somewhat unconventional point of view by relating the feedback regimes to the laser bias current and its optical feedback level. The results enable setting the operating conditions of the diode laser in different applications requiring operation in different feedback regimes. We experimentally explored and theoretically supported this relationship from the standard Lang and Kobayashi rate equation model for a laser diode under optical feedback. All five regimes were explored for two major types of laser diodes: inplane lasers and vertical-cavity surface emitting lasers. For both lasers, we mapped the self-mixing strength vs. drive current and feedback level, observed the differences in the shape of the self-mixing fringes between the two laser architectures and a general simulation, and monitored other parameters of the lasers with changing optical feedback.

Indexed as

laser diodelaser feedback interferometryself-mixing

Identifiers

PMID36433597
PMCPMC9696093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.