Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36433556›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Atlas-Based Segmentation in Extraction of Knee Joint Bone Structures from CT and MR.

Piotr Zarychta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Piotr ZarychtaFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 40 St., 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4889-0957

Funding

Silesian University of Technology 07/010/BK_22/1011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main goal of the approach proposed in this study, which is dedicated to the extraction of bone structures of the knee joint (femoral head, tibia, and patella), was to show a fully automated method of extracting these structures based on atlas segmentation. In order to realize the above-mentioned goal, an algorithm employed automated image-matching as the first step, followed by the normalization of clinical images and the determination of the 11-element dataset to which all scans in the series were allocated. This allowed for a delineation of the average feature vector for the teaching group in the next step, which automated and streamlined known fuzzy segmentation methods (fuzzy c-means (FCM), fuzzy connectedness (FC)). These averaged features were then transmitted to the FCM and FC methods, which were implemented for the testing group and correspondingly for each scan. In this approach, two features are important: the centroids (which become starting points for the fuzzy methods) and the surface area of the extracted bone structure (protects against over-segmentation). This proposed approach was implemented in MATLAB and tested in 61 clinical CT studies of the lower limb on the transverse plane and in 107 T1-weighted MRI studies of the knee joint on the sagittal plane. The atlas-based segmentation combined with the fuzzy methods achieved a Dice index of 85.52-89.48% for the bone structures of the knee joint.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingBone and BonesKnee JointTomography, X-Ray Computedatlas-based segmentationbone structures of the knee jointfemurfuzzy connectednessimage matchingpatellatibia

Identifiers

PMID36433556
PMCPMC9694670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.