ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
1D Barcode Detection: Novel Benchmark Datasets and Comprehensive Comparison of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Approaches.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning framework for barcode localization and decoding using simulated UAV imagery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing image retrieval through optimal barcode representation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An Encoder-Decoder Architecture within a Classical Signal-Processing Framework for Real-Time Barcode Segmentation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advancement in Deep Learning-based Convolutional Neural Networks (D-CNNs) has led research to improve the efficiency and performance of barcode recognition in Supply Chain Management (SCM). D-CNNs required real-world images embedded with ground truth data, which is often not readily available in the case of SCM barcode recognition. This study introduces two invented barcode datasets: InventBar and ParcelBar. The datasets contain labeled barcode images with 527 consumer goods and 844 post boxes in the indoor environment. To explore the influential capability of the datasets that affect recognition process, five existing D-CNN algorithms were applied and compared over a set of recently available barcode datasets. To confirm the model's performance and accuracy, runtime and Mean Average Precision (mAP) were examined based on different IoU thresholds and image transformation settings. The results show that YOLO v5 works best for the ParcelBar in terms of speed and accuracy. The situation is different for the InventBar since Faster R-CNN could allow the model to learn faster with a small drop in accuracy. It is proven that the proposed datasets can be practically utilized for the mainstream D-CNN frameworks. Both are available for developing barcode recognition models and positively affect comparative studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.