ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Deep Reinforcement Learning for Traffic Signal Control Model and Adaptation Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Agent Adaptive Traffic Signal Control Based on Q-Learning and Speed Transition Matrices.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- PyTSC: A Unified Platform for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Traffic Signal Control.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Augmented Reality-Assisted Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Model towards Industrial Training and Maintenance for NanoDrop Spectrophotometer.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep reinforcement learning provides a new approach to solving complex signal optimization problems at intersections. Earlier studies were limited to traditional traffic detection techniques, and the obtained traffic information was not accurate. With the advanced in technology, we can obtain highly accurate information on the traffic states by advanced detector technology. This provides an accurate source of data for deep reinforcement learning. There are many intersections in the urban network. To successfully apply deep reinforcement learning in a situation closer to reality, we need to consider the problem of extending the knowledge gained from the training to new scenarios. This study used advanced sensor technology as a data source to explore the variation pattern of state space under different traffic scenarios. It analyzes the relationship between the traffic demand and the actual traffic states. The model learned more from a more comprehensive state space of traffic. This model was successful applied to new traffic scenarios without additional training. Compared our proposed model with the popular SAC signal control model, the result shows that the average delay of the DQN model is 5.13 s and the SAC model is 6.52 s. Therefore, our model exhibits better control performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.