ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Signal Recovery from Randomly Quantized Data Using Neural Network Approach.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present an efficient scheme based on a long short-term memory (LSTM) autoencoder for accurate seismic deconvolution in a multichannel setup. The technique is beneficial for compressing massive amounts of seismic data. The proposed robust estimation ensures the recovery of sparse reflectivity from acquired seismic data that have been under-quantized. By adjusting the quantization error, the technique considerably improves the robustness of data to the quantization error, thereby boosting the visual saliency of seismic data compared to the other existing algorithms. This framework has been validated using both field and synthetic seismic data sets, and the assessment is carried out by comparing it to the steepest decent and basis pursuit methods. The findings indicate that the proposed scheme outperforms the other algorithms significantly in the following ways: first, in the proposed estimation, fraudulently or overbearingly estimated impulses are significantly suppressed, and second, the proposed guesstimate is much more robust to the quantization interval changes. The tests on real and synthetic data sets reveal that the proposed LSTM autoencoder-based method yields the best results in terms of both quality and computational complexity when compared with existing methods. Finally, the relative reconstruction error (RRE), signal-to-reconstruction error ratio (SRER), and power spectral density (PSD) are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.