Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36433310›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Signal Recovery from Randomly Quantized Data Using Neural Network Approach.

Ali Al-Shaikhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ali Al-ShaikhiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8947-993X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an efficient scheme based on a long short-term memory (LSTM) autoencoder for accurate seismic deconvolution in a multichannel setup. The technique is beneficial for compressing massive amounts of seismic data. The proposed robust estimation ensures the recovery of sparse reflectivity from acquired seismic data that have been under-quantized. By adjusting the quantization error, the technique considerably improves the robustness of data to the quantization error, thereby boosting the visual saliency of seismic data compared to the other existing algorithms. This framework has been validated using both field and synthetic seismic data sets, and the assessment is carried out by comparing it to the steepest decent and basis pursuit methods. The findings indicate that the proposed scheme outperforms the other algorithms significantly in the following ways: first, in the proposed estimation, fraudulently or overbearingly estimated impulses are significantly suppressed, and second, the proposed guesstimate is much more robust to the quantization interval changes. The tests on real and synthetic data sets reveal that the proposed LSTM autoencoder-based method yields the best results in terms of both quality and computational complexity when compared with existing methods. Finally, the relative reconstruction error (RRE), signal-to-reconstruction error ratio (SRER), and power spectral density (PSD) are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm.

Indexed as

deconvolutionLSTM neural networkquantization

Identifiers

PMID36433310
PMCPMC9698862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.