Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36433289›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Pattern Classification Using Quantized Neural Networks for FPGA-Based Low-Power IoT Devices.

Manas Ranjan Biswal, Tahesin Samira Delwar, Abrar Siddique, Prangyadarsini Behera, Yeji Choi, Jee-Youl Ryu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manas Ranjan BiswalDepartment of Intelligent Robot Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4263-9083
Tahesin Samira DelwarDepartment of Intelligent Robot Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4646-763X
Abrar SiddiqueDepartment of Intelligent Robot Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7447-7253
Prangyadarsini BeheraDepartment of Intelligent Robot Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1086-3822
Yeji ChoiDepartment of Intelligent Robot Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea.
Jee-Youl RyuDepartment of Intelligent Robot Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2018R1D1A1B09043286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the recent growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) and the demand for faster computation, quantized neural networks (QNNs) or QNN-enabled IoT can offer better performance than conventional convolution neural networks (CNNs). With the aim of reducing memory access costs and increasing the computation efficiency, QNN-enabled devices are expected to transform numerous industrial applications with lower processing latency and power consumption. Another form of QNN is the binarized neural network (BNN), which has 2 bits of quantized levels. In this paper, CNN-, QNN-, and BNN-based pattern recognition techniques are implemented and analyzed on an FPGA. The FPGA hardware acts as an IoT device due to connectivity with the cloud, and QNN and BNN are considered to offer better performance in terms of low power and low resource use on hardware platforms. The CNN and QNN implementation and their comparative analysis are analyzed based on their accuracy, weight bit error, RoC curve, and execution speed. The paper also discusses various approaches that can be deployed for optimizing various CNN and QNN models with additionally available tools. The work is performed on the Xilinx Zynq 7020 series Pynq Z2 board, which serves as our FPGA-based low-power IoT device. The MNIST and CIFAR-10 databases are considered for simulation and experimentation. The work shows that the accuracy is 95.5% and 79.22% for the MNIST and CIFAR-10 databases, respectively, for full precision (32-bit), and the execution time is 5.8 ms and 18 ms for the MNIST and CIFAR-10 databases, respectively, for full precision (32-bit).

Indexed as

ComputersNeural Networks, ComputerComputer SimulationDatabases, Factualbinary neural network (BNN)convolutional neural network (CNN)FPGAinternet of things (IoT)pattern recognitionquantized neural network (QNN)

Identifiers

PMID36433289
PMCPMC9699191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.