ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Force-Sensorless Identification and Classification of Tissue Biomechanical Parameters for Robot-Assisted Palpation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Haptic and Palpation Sensing for Robotic Surgery: Engineering Perspectives on Design and Integration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Palpation sensing for robotic-assisted surgery.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Deformable and Fragile Object Manipulation: A Review and Prospects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The implementation of robotic systems for minimally invasive surgery and medical procedures is an active topic of research in recent years. One of the most common procedures is the palpation of soft tissues to identify their mechanical characteristics. In particular, it is very useful to identify the tissue's stiffness or equivalently its elasticity coefficient. However, this identification relies on the existence of a force sensor or a tactile sensor mounted at the tip of the robot, as well as on measuring the robot velocity. For some applications it would be desirable to identify the biomechanical characteristics of soft tissues without the need for a force/tactile nor velocity sensors. An estimation of such quantities can be obtained by a model-based state observer for which the inputs are only the robot joint positions and its commanded joint torques. The estimated velocities and forces can then be employed for closed-loop force control, force reflection, and mechanical parameters estimation. In this work, a closed-loop force control is proposed based on the estimated contact forces to avoid any tissue damage. Then, the information from the estimated forces and velocities is used in a least squares estimator of the mechanical parameters. Moreover, the estimated biomechanical parameters are employed in a Bayesian classifier to provide further help for the physician to make a diagnosis. We have found that a combination of the parameters of both linear and nonlinear viscoelastic models provide better classification results: 0% misclassifications against 50% when using a linear model, and 3.12% when using only a nonlinear model, for the case in which the samples have very similar mechanical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.