ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
A Novel Sparse Framework for Angle and Frequency Estimation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The topic of joint angle and frequency estimation (JAFE) has aroused extensive interests in the past decades. Current estimation algorithms mainly rely on the Nyquist sampling criterion. In order not to cause ambiguity for parameter estimation, the space-time intervals must be smaller than given thresholds, which results in complicated hardware costs and a huge computational burden. This paper aims to reduce the complexity for JAFE, and a novel sparsity-aware framework is proposed. Unlike the current uniform sampling architectures, the incoming narrow-band singles are sampled by a series of space-time coprime samplers. An improved rotational invariance estimator is introduced, which offers closed-form solutions for both angle and frequency estimation. The mathematical treatments indicate that our methodology is inherent in larger spatial/temporal aperture than the uniform sampling architectures; hence, it provides more accurate JAFE compared to alternative approaches relying on uniform sampling. Additionally, it attains nearly the same complexity as the current rotational invariance approach. Numerical results agree with the theoretical advantages of our methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.