Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36433226›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Performance and Accuracy Comparisons of Classification Methods and Perspective Solutions for UAV-Based Near-Real-Time "Out of the Lab" Data Processing.

Zsófia Varga, Fanni Vörös, Márton Pál, Béla Kovács, András Jung, István Elek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zsófia VargaInstitute of Cartography and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Informatics, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2390-2958
Fanni VörösInstitute of Cartography and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Informatics, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-0795-2739
Márton PálInstitute of Cartography and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Informatics, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.
Béla KovácsInstitute of Cartography and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Informatics, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1864-0770
András JungInstitute of Cartography and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Informatics, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3250-4097
István ElekInstitute of Cartography and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Informatics, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary TKP2021-NVA-29
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, integration into automated systems has become a priority in the development of remote sensing sensors carried on drones. For this purpose, the primary task is to achieve real-time data processing. Increasing sensor resolution, fast data capture and the simultaneous use of multiple sensors is one direction of development. However, this poses challenges on the data processing side due to the increasing amount of data. Our study intends to investigate how the running time and accuracy of commonly used image classification algorithms evolve using Altum Micasense multispectral and thermal acquisition data with GSD = 2 cm spatial resolution. The running times were examined for two PC configurations, with a 4 GB and 8 GB DRAM capacity, respectively, as these parameters are closer to the memory of NRT microcomputers and laptops, which can be applied "out of the lab". During the accuracy assessment, we compared the accuracy %, the Kappa index value and the area ratio of correct pixels. According to our results, in the case of plant cover, the Spectral Angles Mapper (SAM) method achieved the best accuracy among the validated classification solutions. In contrast, the Minimum Distance (MD) method achieved the best accuracy on water surface. In terms of temporality, the best results were obtained with the individually constructed decision tree classification. Thus, it is worth developing these two directions into real-time data processing solutions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsTelemetryclassification’s running timeCTA analysisdecision rulesGIS data NRT processing “out of the lab”PCA analysisUAV multispectral images classifications

Identifiers

PMID36433226
PMCPMC9696863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.