ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Sprint Acceleration Mechanical Outputs Derived from Position- or Velocity-Time Data: A Multi-System Comparison Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06619132 (Training Load Adapted to Muscle Properties to Reduce Injury Occurrence in Sprint), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Training Load Adapted to Muscle Properties to Reduce Injury Occurrence in Sprint
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Reliability of Sprint Time and Force-Velocity Profiles During Sprint Acceleration in Elite Rugby Union Players: Inter-Trial Reliability of Linear Encoder, GPS, Timing Gates and Video Analysis.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessing Sprint Mechanical Outputs Derived from LPS, Radar and Laser Technologies in Basketball.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Does Placement of Timing Sensors and Sprinting Model Alter Force-Velocity Metrics? A GNSS Simulation Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Drone-Based Method to Measure Sprint Force-Velocity Profiles in 30-Meter Sprint Test - A Pilot Study.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing Deceleration Performance: Methodological and Practical Considerations.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Validity and Reliability of a Radar Tracking Device in Ice Hockey Testing.International journal of exercise science · 2026Article
- Development of a preliminary multivariable model predicting hamstring strain injuries during preseason screening in soccer players: a multidisciplinary approach.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Validity and reliability of sprint force-velocity profiling in elite football: Comparison of MySprint, GPS, and radar devices.PloS one · 2025Article
- The Measurement of Spatiotemporal Parameters in Running at Different Velocities: A Comparison Between a GPS Unit and an Infrared Mat.Methods and protocols · 2024Article
- Impact of Hydraulic Resistance on Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Initial Six Steps When Sprinting Under Varying Loads.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Article
- Effect of Advanced Footwear Technology Spikes on Sprint Acceleration: A Multiple N-of-1 Trial.Sports medicine - open · 2024Article
- The validity and reliability of a hydraulic resistance device for assessing resisted sprint time.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Sprint Force-Velocity Profile Assessed with K-AI Wearable Tech.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Load-Velocity Relationship in Sprint?Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023Article
- Microdosing Sprint Distribution as an Alternative to Achieve Better Sprint Performance in Field Hockey Players.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To directly compare five commonly used on-field systems (motorized linear encoder, laser, radar, global positioning system, and timing gates) during sprint acceleration to (i) measure velocity−time data, (ii) compute the main associated force−velocity variables, and (iii) assess their respective inter-trial reliability. Eighteen participants performed three 40 m sprints, during which five systems were used to simultaneously and separately record the body center of the mass horizontal position or velocity over time. Horizontal force−velocity mechanical outputs for the two best trials were computed following an inverse dynamic model and based on an exponential fitting of the position- or velocity-time data. Between the five systems, the maximal running velocity was close (7.99 to 8.04 m.s−1), while the time constant showed larger differences (1.18 to 1.29 s). Concurrent validity results overall showed a relative systematic error of 0.86 to 2.28% for maximum and theoretically maximal velocity variables and 4.78 to 12.9% for early acceleration variables. The inter-trial reliability showed low coefficients of variation (all <5.74%), and was very close between all of the systems. All of the systems tested here can be considered relevant to measure the maximal velocity and compute the force−velocity mechanical outputs. Practitioners are advised to interpret the data obtained with either of these systems in light of these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.