ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Optimizing the Ultrasound Tongue Image Representation for Residual Network-Based Articulatory-to-Acoustic Mapping.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cleft Lip and Palate Classification Through Vision Transformers and Siamese Neural Networks.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- Speech disorders in patients with Tongue squamous cell carcinoma: A longitudinal observational study based on a questionnaire and acoustic analysis.BMC oral health · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Within speech processing, articulatory-to-acoustic mapping (AAM) methods can apply ultrasound tongue imaging (UTI) as an input. (Micro)convex transducers are mostly used, which provide a wedge-shape visual image. However, this process is optimized for the visual inspection of the human eye, and the signal is often post-processed by the equipment. With newer ultrasound equipment, now it is possible to gain access to the raw scanline data (i.e., ultrasound echo return) without any internal post-processing. In this study, we compared the raw scanline representation with the wedge-shaped processed UTI as the input for the residual network applied for AAM, and we also investigated the optimal size of the input image. We found no significant differences between the performance attained using the raw data and the wedge-shaped image extrapolated from it. We found the optimal pixel size to be 64 × 43 in the case of the raw scanline input, and 64 × 64 when transformed to a wedge. Therefore, it is not necessary to use the full original 64 × 842 pixels raw scanline, but a smaller image is enough. This allows for the building of smaller networks, and will be beneficial for the development of session and speaker-independent methods for practical applications. AAM systems have the target application of a "silent speech interface", which could be helpful for the communication of the speaking-impaired, in military applications, or in extremely noisy conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.