Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36433142›Full record

ReviewPolymers2022

Upcycling Polystyrene.

Jaworski C Capricho, Krishnamurthy Prasad, Nishar Hameed, Mostafa Nikzad, Nisa Salim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Reassessing the Photochemical Upcycling of Polystyrene Using Acridinium Salts.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jaworski C CaprichoSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2847-2483
Krishnamurthy PrasadSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7034-4288
Nishar HameedSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.
Mostafa NikzadSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.
Nisa SalimSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.

Funding

Sustainability of Victoria C-12105.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several environmental and techno-economic assessments highlighted the advantage of placing polystyrene-based materials in a circular loop, from production to waste generation to product refabrication, either following the mechanical or thermochemical routes. This review provides an assortment of promising approaches to solving the dilemma of polystyrene waste. With a focus on upcycling technologies available in the last five years, the review first gives an overview of polystyrene, its chemistry, types, forms, and varied applications. This work presents all the stages that involve polystyrene's cycle of life and the properties that make this product, in mixtures with other polymers, command a demand on the market. The features and mechanical performance of the studied materials with their associated images give an idea of the influence of recycling on the structure. Notably, technological assessments of elucidated approaches are also provided. No single approach can be mentioned as effective per se; hybrid technologies appear to possess the highest potential. Finally, this review correlates the amenability of these polystyrene upcycling methodologies to frontier technologies relating to 3D printing, human space habitation, flow chemistry, vertical farming, and green hydrogen, which may be less intuitive to many.

Indexed as

environmental assessmentplastic pollutionpolystyrenerecyclingsustainabilitywaste plastics

Identifiers

PMID36433142
PMCPMC9695542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.