Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36433124›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Comparative In Vitro Biocompatibility Study of the Two Orthodontic Bonding Materials of Different Types.

Predrag Janošević, Sanja Stojanović, Ivana Stojanović, Mirjana Janošević, Stevo Najman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Predrag JanoševićDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Sanja StojanovićDepartment of Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Ivana StojanovićDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Mirjana JanoševićDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Stevo NajmanDepartment of Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-2411-9802

Funding

Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia III 41017, 451-03-68/2020-14/200113, 451-03-9/2021-14/200113 and 451-03-68/2022-14/200113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, the in vitro biocompatibility and cell response to two commonly used orthodontic bonding materials of different types, one self-curing and one light-curing, were examined and compared in indirect and direct cell culture systems. The study was conducted on fibroblasts and macrophages as in vitro models to study the biocompatibility of dental materials. Differences were found between the light- and self-curing material in cytotoxicity and effects on fibroblasts' proliferation in indirect cell culture systems as well as in macrophages response in vitro in both direct and indirect cell culture systems. Based on the obtained results, we can conclude that the self-curing material is generally more cytotoxic for fibroblasts compared to the light-curing, while macrophages' response to these materials was dependent on the macrophages' state and differed between the examined materials. This indicates that more attention should be paid when choosing and applying these materials in practice due to their toxicity to cells. Prior to their use, all aspects should be considered regarding the patient's conditions, associated problems, microenvironment in the oral cavity, etc. Further studies on in vivo models should be conducted to fully understand the potential long-term effects of the use of mentioned materials in orthodontics.

Indexed as

biocompatibilityfibroblastsin vitromacrophagesorthodontic bonding materials

Identifiers

PMID36433124
PMCPMC9698495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.