Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36432832›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture; Analysing Contributions of Different Biological Compartments to Nutrient Removal in a Duckweed-Based Water Remediation System.

Simona Paolacci, Vlastimil Stejskal, Damien Toner, Marcel A K Jansen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Duckweed: Research Meets Applications.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Simona PaolacciSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, T23 N73K Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0057-623X
Vlastimil StejskalSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, T23 N73K Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7892-695X
Damien TonerBIM, Ireland's Seafood Development Agency, Crofton Rd, Dun Laoghaire, A96 E5A0 Co. Dublin, Ireland.
Marcel A K JansenSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, T23 N73K Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2014-5859
University College Cork · IE

Funding

Irish Sea Fisheries Board European Maritime and Fisheries Fund 2014-2020).)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duckweed (Lemnaceae) can support the development of freshwater aquaculture if used as extractive species in Integrated MultiTrophic Aquaculture (IMTA) systems. These aquatic plants have the advantage of producing protein-rich biomass that has several potential uses. On the contrary, other biological compartments, such as microalgae and bacteria, present in the water and competing with duckweed for light and nutrients cannot be harvested easily from the water. Moreover, as phytoplankton cannot easily be harvested, nutrients are eventually re-released; hence, this compartment does not contribute to the overall water remediation process. In the present study, a mesocosm experiment was designed to quantify the portion of nutrients effectively removed by duckweed in a duckweed-based aquaculture wastewater remediation system. Three tanks were buried next to a pilot-scale IMTA system used for the production of rainbow trout and perch. The tanks received aquaculture effluents from the adjacent system, and 50% of their surface was covered by duckweed. Daily water analyses of samples at the inlet and outlet of the mesocosm allowed quantification of the amount of nutrients removed in total. The portion removed by duckweed was determined by examining the nutrient content in the initial and final biomass. The portion of nutrients removed by other compartments was similarly estimated. The results show that duckweed is responsible for the removal of 31% and 29% of N and P, respectively. Phytoplankton removed 33% and 38% of N and P, respectively, while the biofilm played no major role in nutrient removal. The remainder of the removed nutrients were probably assimilated by bacteria or sedimented. It is speculated that a higher initial duckweed density can limit phytoplankton growth and, therefore, increase the portion of nutrients removed by the duckweed compartment.

Indexed as

aquaculture effluentsbacteriaIMTALemnaceaephytoplanktonphytoremediationRAS

Identifiers

PMID36432832
PMCPMC9698553
OpenAlexW4309312344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.