Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Arerut YarnvudhiDepartment of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1954-3411
Nisa LeksungnoenDepartment of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Tushar AndriyasCenter for Advance Studies in Tropical Natural Resources, National Research University-Kasetsart University, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Pantana Tor-NgernDepartment of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7363-4926
Aerwadee PremashthiraDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Chongrak WachrinratCenter for Advance Studies in Tropical Natural Resources, National Research University-Kasetsart University, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Dokrak MarodDepartment of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Sutheera HermhukFaculty of Agricultural Production, Maejo University, Chiang Mai 50290, Thailand.
Sura PattanakiatFaculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6618-7088
Tohru NakashizukaForest and Forest Products Research Institute, Tsukuba 300-1244, Japan.
Roger Kjelgren12HE UF/IFAS Dept. Environmental Horticulture, University of Florida, Apopka, FL 32703, USA.
Funding
Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI) 2021the Office of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation; and the Thai-land Science Research and Innovation through the Kasetsart University Reinventing University Program 2021 2021
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
We present the results of classifying plants at species level that can tolerate air pollution, provide cooling, and simultaneously survive and thrive in urban environments. For this purpose, we estimated the air pollution tolerance index (APTI) and anticipated performance index (API) of several species growing in a park located in central Bangkok, Thailand. The cooling effect was quantified by calculating the reduction in soil and air temperatures.
Indexed as
air pollution toleranceanticipated performance indexecosystem servicesshading
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Assessing the Cooling and Air Pollution Tolerance among Urban Tree Species in a Tropical Climate. · full record | OpenQuestion