Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36432790›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Transcriptome Analysis of Wheat-

Malkhan Singh Gurjar, Shekhar Jain, Rashmi Aggarwal, Mahender Singh Saharan, Tej Pratap Jitendra Kumar, Lalit Kharbikar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Transcriptome analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Malkhan Singh GurjarDivision of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4292-1882
Shekhar JainDivision of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9054-6343
Rashmi AggarwalDivision of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Mahender Singh SaharanDivision of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Tej Pratap Jitendra KumarDivision of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Lalit KharbikarBiotechnology Section, ICAR-National Institute of Biotic Stress Management, Raipur 493225, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8250-3132

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research ICAR-Consortium Research Platform on Genomics (ICAR-G/CRP-Genomics/2015-2720/IARI-12-151)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Karnal bunt (Tilletia indica Mitra) is an internationally quarantined disease of wheat. Until now, very little information has been available on the molecular basis of resistance and pathogenicity of T. indica. To investigate the molecular basis of host−pathogen interaction, the transcriptome of T. indica inoculated resistant (HD29) and susceptible (WH542) genotypes of wheat were analyzed. Approximately 58 million reads were generated using RNA sequencing by the Illumina NextSeq500 platform. These sequence reads were aligned to a reference genome of wheat to compare the expression level of genes in resistant and susceptible genotypes. The high-quality reads were deposited in the NCBI SRA database (SRP159223). More than 80,000 genes were expressed in both the resistant and susceptible wheat genotypes. Of these, 76,088 were commonly expressed genes, including 3184 significantly upregulated and 1778 downregulated genes. Four thousand one hundred thirteen and 5604 genes were exclusively expressed in susceptible and resistant genotypes, respectively. Based on the significance, 503 genes were upregulated and 387 genes were downregulated. Using gene ontology, the majority of coding sequences were associated with response to stimuli, stress, carbohydrate metabolism, developmental process, and catalytic activity. Highly differentially expressed genes (integral component of membrane, exonuclease activity, nucleic acid binding, DNA binding, metal ion binding) were validated in resistant and susceptible genotypes using qPCR analysis and similar expression levels were found in RNA-Seq. Apart from the wheat, the mapping of T. indica was 7.07% and 7.63% of resistant and susceptible hosts, respectively, upon infection, which revealed significant pathogenesis-related genes. This first study provided in-depth information and new insights into wheat−T. indica interaction for managing Karnal bunt disease of wheat.

Indexed as

defense genesDEGsKarnal buntmappingRNA SeqTilletia indicawheat

Identifiers

PMID36432790
PMCPMC9698794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.