Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36432733›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Dendritic Cell-Derived Artificial Microvesicles Inhibit RLS

Oleg V Markov, Aleksandra V Sen'kova, Islam S Mohamed, Elena V Shmendel, Mikhail A Maslov, Anastasiya L Oshchepkova, Evgeniy V Brenner, Nadezhda L Mironova, Marina A Zenkova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oleg V MarkovInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Lavrentieva Ave. 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8381-1890
Aleksandra V Sen'kovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Lavrentieva Ave. 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5729-9910
Islam S MohamedInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Lavrentieva Ave. 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1710-3925
Elena V ShmendelM.V. Lomonosov Institute of Fine Chemical Technologies, MIREA-Russian Technological University, Vernadskogo Ave. 86, 119571 Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail A MaslovM.V. Lomonosov Institute of Fine Chemical Technologies, MIREA-Russian Technological University, Vernadskogo Ave. 86, 119571 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5372-1325
Anastasiya L OshchepkovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Lavrentieva Ave. 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0134-0328
Evgeniy V BrennerInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Lavrentieva Ave. 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Nadezhda L MironovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Lavrentieva Ave. 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4375-0269
Marina A ZenkovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Lavrentieva Ave. 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4044-1049
Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine · RUMIREA - Russian Technological University · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 19-74-30011the Russian state-funded budget project of ICBFM 121031300044-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-free antitumor vaccines represent a promising approach to immunotherapy of cancer. Here, we compare the antitumor potential of cell-free vaccines based on microvesicles derived from dendritic cells (DCs) with DC- and cationic-liposome-based vaccines using a murine model of drug-resistant lymphosarcoma RLS40 in vivo. The vaccines were the following: microvesicle vaccines—cytochalasin B-induced membrane vesicles (CIMVs) obtained from DCs loaded with total tumor RNA using cholesterol/spermine-containing cationic liposomes L or mannosylated liposomes ML; DC vaccines—murine DCs loaded with total tumor-derived RNA using the same liposomes; and liposomal vaccines—lipoplexes of total tumor-derived RNA with liposomes L or ML. Being non-hepatotoxic, CIMV- and DC-based vaccines administered subcutaneously exhibited comparable potential to stimulate highly efficient antitumor CTLs in vivo, whereas liposomal vaccines were 25% weaker CTL inducers. Nevertheless, the antitumor efficiencies of the different types of the vaccines were similar: sizes of tumor nodes and the number of liver metastases were significantly decreased, regardless of the vaccine type. Notably, the booster vaccination did not improve the overall antitumor efficacy of the vaccines under the study. CIMV- and DC- based vaccines more efficiently than liposome-based ones decreased mitotic activity of tumor cells and induced their apoptosis, stimulated accumulation of neutrophil inflammatory infiltration in tumor tissue, and had a more pronounced immunomodulatory activity toward the spleen and thymus. Administration of CIMV-, DC-, and liposome-based vaccines resulted in activation of Th1/Th17 cells as well as the induction of positive immune checkpoint 4-1BBL and downregulation of suppressive immune checkpoints in a raw PD-1 >>> TIGIT > CTLA4 > TIM3. We demonstrated that cell-free CIMV-based vaccines exhibited superior antitumor and antimetastatic activity in a tumor model in vivo. The obtained results can be considered as the basis for developing novel strategies for oncoimmunotherapy.

Indexed as

antitumor immunotherapyantitumor vaccinescationic liposomescytochalasin B-induced membrane vesiclesdendritic cellsimmune checkpointsmurine lymphosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID36432733
PMCPMC9696603
OpenAlexW4309542911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.