Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36432691›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2022

Rotary Jet Spinning (RJS): A Key Process to Produce Biopolymeric Wound Dressings.

Juliana O Bahú, Lucas R Melo de Andrade, Sara Crivellin, Nadia G Khouri, Sara O Sousa, Luiza M I Fernandes, Samuel D A Souza, Luz S Cárdenas Concha, Maria I R B Schiavon, Cibelem I Benites and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Juliana O BahúINCT-BIOFABRIS, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas, Albert Einstein Ave., Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, nº. 500, Campinas 13083-852, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lucas R Melo de AndradeLaboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Food and Nutrition, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8866-2030
Sara CrivellinINCT-BIOFABRIS, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas, Albert Einstein Ave., Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, nº. 500, Campinas 13083-852, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1492-9035
Nadia G KhouriINCT-BIOFABRIS, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas, Albert Einstein Ave., Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, nº. 500, Campinas 13083-852, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sara O SousaInstitute of Environmental, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Science, School of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Nicolau St., Jd. Pitangueiras, Diadema 09913-030, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiza M I FernandesInstitute of Environmental, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Science, School of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Nicolau St., Jd. Pitangueiras, Diadema 09913-030, São Paulo, Brazil.
Samuel D A SouzaINCT-BIOFABRIS, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas, Albert Einstein Ave., Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, nº. 500, Campinas 13083-852, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luz S Cárdenas ConchaGraduate School, Sciences and Engineering, National University of Trujillo, Av. Juan Pablo II S/N Urb. San Andrés, Trujillo 13011, La Libertad, Peru.
Maria I R B SchiavonINCT-BIOFABRIS, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas, Albert Einstein Ave., Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, nº. 500, Campinas 13083-852, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0867-9663
Cibelem I BenitesFederal Laboratory of Agricultural and Livestock Defense (LFDA-SP), Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply (MAPA), Campinas 70043-900, São Paulo, Brazil.
Patrícia SeverinoTechnology and Research Institute (ITP), Tiradentes University (UNIT), Murilo Dantas Ave., Farolândia, nº 300, Aracaju 49032-490, Sergipe, Brazil.
Eliana B SoutoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy of University of Porto (FFUP), Rua Jorge de Viterbo Ferreira, nº 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9737-6017
Viktor O Cárdenas ConchaINCT-BIOFABRIS, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas, Albert Einstein Ave., Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, nº. 500, Campinas 13083-852, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3520-4535
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRInstituto de Tecnologia e Pesquisa · BRMinistry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Food Supply · BRNational University of Trujillo · PEUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wounds result from different causes (e.g., trauma, surgeries, and diabetic ulcers), requiring even extended periods of intensive care for healing, according to the patient's organism and treatment. Currently, wound dressings generated by polymeric fibers at micro and nanometric scales are promising for healing the injured area. They offer great surface area and porosity, mimicking the fibrous extracellular matrix structure, facilitating cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation, and accelerating the wound healing process. Such properties resulted in countless applications of these materials in biomedical and tissue engineering, also as drug delivery systems for bioactive molecules to help tissue regeneration. The techniques used to engineer these fibers include spinning methods (electro-, rotary jet-), airbrushing, and 3D printing. These techniques have important advantages, such as easy-handle procedure and process parameters variability (type of polymer), but encounter some scalability problems. RJS is described as a simple and low-cost technique resulting in high efficiency and yield for fiber production, also capable of bioactive agents' incorporation to improve the healing potential of RJS wound dressings. This review addresses the use of RJS to produce polymeric fibers, describing the concept, type of configuration, comparison to other spinning techniques, most commonly used polymers, and the relevant parameters that influence the manufacture of the fibers, for the ultimate use in the development of wound dressings.

Indexed as

drug deliveryhealingmedical applicationsnanofiberspolymersprocessingrotary jet spinning (RJS)wound dressings

Identifiers

PMID36432691
PMCPMC9699276
OpenAlexW4309461282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.