Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36432507›Full record

ReviewNutrients2022

Mapping the Literature on Diet and Multiple Sclerosis: A Data-Driven Approach.

Xiaochen Qu, Erin I Walsh, Nicolas Cherbuin, Lucinda J Black

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaochen QuCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.
Erin I WalshPopulation Health Exchange, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2615, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8941-0046
Nicolas CherbuinDepartment of Health Economics Wellbeing and Society, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2615, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6481-0748
Lucinda J BlackCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4727-4773

Funding

Curtin University NAMS Australia Postdoctoral Fellowship NAMultiple Sclerosis Western Australia (MSWA) NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease of the central nervous system that is currently incurable. Diet may influence the onset and progression of MS. A variety of literature reviews have been conducted in the field of diet and MS. However, conventional reviews mostly focus on specific topics rather than delivering a holistic view of the literature landscape. Using a data-driven approach, we aimed to provide an overview of the literature on diet and MS, revealing gaps in knowledge. We conducted citation network analysis to identify clusters of all available publications about diet and MS over the past 50 years. We also conducted topic analysis of each cluster and illustrated them in word clouds. Four main clusters were identified from 1626 publications: MS risk and symptom management; mouse models of MS; gluten sensitivity; and dysphagia. Citation network analysis revealed that in this emerging field, articles published after 1991 were more likely to be highly cited. Relatively few studies focused on MS disease progression compared to risk factors, and limited evidence was available for many foods and nutrients in relation to MS. Future studies could focus on filling these identified knowledge gaps.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisAnimalsDietFoodMiceNutrientsPublicationsNutrientscitation network analysisdietmultiple sclerosisnutritiontext mining

Identifiers

PMID36432507
PMCPMC9696310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.