Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36432453›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2022

Effects of Early versus Standard Central Line Removal on the Growth of Preterm Infants with Very Low Birth Weight: A Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Justyna Romańska, Tomasz Wawrzoniak, Paweł Krajewski, Joanna Seliga-Siwecka, Natalia Brunets, Izabela Lehman, Renata Bokiniec, Ewa Adamska, Barbara Królak-Olejnik, Jan Modzelewski and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Expert consensus on parenteral nutrition management in neonates (2025)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Justyna RomańskaDivision of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Medical University of Warsaw, Starynkiewicza Sq. 1/3, 02-015 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8503-6229
Tomasz WawrzoniakDepartment of Neonatology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Czerniakowska 231 St., 00-416 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1802-8867
Paweł KrajewskiDivision of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Medical University of Warsaw, Starynkiewicza Sq. 1/3, 02-015 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3825-3375
Joanna Seliga-SiweckaDepartment of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, The Medical University of Warsaw, Karowa 2 St., 00-315 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4628-0541
Natalia BrunetsDepartment of Prematurity and Neonatal Pathology, ŻELAZNA Medical Center Ltd. St. Sophia's Specialist Hospital, Żelazna 90 St., 01-004 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3786-9426
Izabela LehmanDepartment of Neonatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213 St., 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0225-1431
Renata BokiniecDepartment of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, The Medical University of Warsaw, Karowa 2 St., 00-315 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1164-8406
Ewa AdamskaDepartment of Prematurity and Neonatal Pathology, ŻELAZNA Medical Center Ltd. St. Sophia's Specialist Hospital, Żelazna 90 St., 01-004 Warsaw, Poland.
Barbara Królak-OlejnikDepartment of Neonatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213 St., 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Jan Modzelewski1st Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Żelazna 90 St., 01-004 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2648-7921
Tomasz Szczapa2nd Department of Neonatology, Neonatal Biophysical Monitoring and Cardiopulmonary Therapies Research Unit, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Polna 33 St., 60-535 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5214-2719
Medical University of Warsaw · PLPostgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PLWroclaw Medical University · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

Fundacja NUTRICIA RG 2/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Very preterm infants are usually supported by parenteral nutrition delivered through central lines (CLs) while progressing with enteral intake, although the optimal time point for their removal is unclear. This study evaluated the impact of the CL discontinuation time on the short-term growth outcomes of preterm infants. A non-inferiority, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial was conducted in four neonatal intensive care units in Poland. Preterm infants with very low birth weight (VLBW) without congenital abnormalities were eligible. Patients were allocated to discontinue central access at an enteral feeding volume of 100 mL/kg/day (intervention group) or 140 mL/kg/day (control group). The study's primary outcome was weight at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age, with a non-inferiority margin of -210 g. Overall, 211 patients were allocated to the intervention or control groups between January 2019 and February 2021, of which 101 and 100 were eligible for intention-to-treat analysis, respectively. The mean weight was 2232 g and 2200 g at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The mean between-group difference was 32 g (95% confidence interval, -68 to 132;

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesEnteral NutritionFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Very Low Birth WeightParenteral Nutritioncentral linecentral-line-associated bloodstream infectionenteral nutritiongrowthparenteral nutritionpremature infant

Identifiers

PMID36432453
PMCPMC9692930
OpenAlexW4308970413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.