Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36432134›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Nanocellulose: A Fundamental Material for Science and Technology Applications.

Aiswarya Poulose, Jyotishkumar Parameswaranpillai, Jinu Jacob George, Jineesh Ayippadath Gopi, Senthilkumar Krishnasamy, Midhun Dominic C D, Nishar Hameed, Nisa V Salim, Sabarish Radoor, Natalia Sienkiewicz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aiswarya PouloseDepartment of Polymer Science and Rubber Technology, CUSAT, Kochi 682022, India.
Jyotishkumar ParameswaranpillaiDepartment of Science, Faculty of Science & Technology, Alliance University, Chandapura-Anekal Main Road, Bengaluru 562106, India.
Jinu Jacob GeorgeDepartment of Polymer Science and Rubber Technology, CUSAT, Kochi 682022, India.
Jineesh Ayippadath GopiDepartment of Science, Faculty of Science & Technology, Alliance University, Chandapura-Anekal Main Road, Bengaluru 562106, India.
Senthilkumar KrishnasamyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, PSG Institute of Technology and Applied Research, Coimbatore 641062, India.
Midhun Dominic C DDepartment of Chemistry, Sacred Heart College (Autonomous), Kochi 682013, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9170-6575
Nishar HameedDepartment of Mechanical and Product Design Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia.
Nisa V SalimFaculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria 3122, Australia.
Sabarish RadoorDepartment of Polymer-Nano Science and Technology, Jeonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si 54896, Republic of Korea.
Natalia SienkiewiczFaculty of Chemistry, Institute of Polymer and Dye Technology, Lodz University of Technology, Stefanowskiego 16, 90-537 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2187-4335

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, considerable interest has been focused on developing greener and biodegradable materials due to growing environmental concerns. Owing to their low cost, biodegradability, and good mechanical properties, plant fibers have substituted synthetic fibers in the preparation of composites. However, the poor interfacial adhesion due to the hydrophilic nature and high-water absorption limits the use of plant fibers as a reinforcing agent in polymer matrices. The hydrophilic nature of the plant fibers can be overcome by chemical treatments. Cellulose the most abundant natural polymer obtained from sources such as plants, wood, and bacteria has gained wider attention these days. Different methods, such as mechanical, chemical, and chemical treatments in combination with mechanical treatments, have been adopted by researchers for the extraction of cellulose from plants, bacteria, algae, etc. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) have been extracted and used for different applications such as food packaging, water purification, drug delivery, and in composites. In this review, updated information on the methods of isolation of nanocellulose, classification, characterization, and application of nanocellulose has been highlighted. The characteristics and the current status of cellulose-based fiber-reinforced polymer composites in the industry have also been discussed in detail.

Indexed as

CelluloseNanoparticlesChemical PhenomenaFood PackagingTechnologyCelluloseapplicationsbiodegradablecompositesnanocellulose

Identifiers

PMID36432134
PMCPMC9694617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.