Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36432006›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

NMR-Based Approaches in the Study of Foods.

Anatoly P Sobolev, Cinzia Ingallina, Mattia Spano, Giacomo Di Matteo, Luisa Mannina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Aflatoxin exposure and health impacts: global burden and advances in detection technologies.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. UrinaryMetabolites · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anatoly P SobolevMagnetic Resonance Laboratory "Segre-Capitani", Institute for Biological Systems, CNR, Via Salaria, Km 29.300, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8709-7666
Cinzia IngallinaLaboratory of Food Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Technology of Drugs, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4817-7318
Mattia SpanoLaboratory of Food Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Technology of Drugs, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5035-0971
Giacomo Di MatteoLaboratory of Food Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Technology of Drugs, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0110-5010
Luisa ManninaLaboratory of Food Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Technology of Drugs, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8659-5890

Funding

POR FESR Lazio Progetto T0002E0001. "Progetti di Gruppi di Ricerca 2020" Protocol A0375-2020-36541 CUP: B85F21001170002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, the three different NMR-based approaches usually used to study foodstuffs are described, reporting specific examples. The first approach starts with the food of interest that can be investigated using different complementary NMR methodologies to obtain a comprehensive picture of food composition and structure; another approach starts with the specific problem related to a given food (frauds, safety, traceability, geographical and botanical origin, farming methods, food processing, maturation and ageing, etc.) that can be addressed by choosing the most suitable NMR methodology; finally, it is possible to start from a single NMR methodology, developing a broad range of applications to tackle common food-related challenges and different aspects related to foods.

Indexed as

FoodFood AnalysisFood HandlingMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopyfood compositionfood structureNMR methodology

Identifiers

PMID36432006
PMCPMC9697393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.