ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Fast and Sensitive Analysis of Short- and Long-Chain Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Foods of Animal Origin.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- QuEChERS-Based LC-MS/MS and HRMS Methods for PFAS Determination in Food: A Systematic Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Eco-Friendly Sample Preparation Trends for Exogenous Toxic Organic Compounds in Food: A Sustainable Perspective for LC-MS Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- What We Know About per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Contamination Levels in Milk. A Review from the Last Decade.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Critical Role of Commercial Analytical Reference Standards in the Control of Chemical Risks: The Case of PFAS and Ways Forward.Environmental health perspectives · 2025Article
- There's Something in What We Eat: An Overview on the Extraction Techniques and Chromatographic Analysis for PFAS Identification in Agri-Food Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in the Chromatographic Analysis of Emerging Pollutants in Dairy Milk: A Review (2018-2023).Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The availability of sensitive analytical methods to detect per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in food of animal origin is fundamental for monitoring programs to collect data useful for improving risk assessment strategies. The present study aimed to develop and validate a fast and sensitive method for determining short and long-chain PFASs in meat (bovine, fish, and swine muscle), bovine liver, hen eggs, and cow’s milk to be easily applicable in routine analysis of food. A QuEChERS extraction and clean-up method in combination with liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MSMS) were used. The method resulted in good linearity (Pearson’s R > 0.99), low limits of detection (7.78−16.35 ng/kg, 8.26−34.01 ng/kg, 6.70−33.65 ng/kg, and 5.92−19.07 ng/kg for milk, liver, egg, and muscle, respectively), and appropriate limits of quantification (50 ng/kg for all compounds except for GenX and C6O4, where the limits of quantification were 100 ng/kg). Trueness and precision for all the tested levels met the acceptability criteria of 80−120% and ≤20%, respectively, regardless of the analyzed matrix. As to measurement uncertainty, it was <50% for all compound/matrix combinations. These results demonstrate the selectivity and sensitivity of the method for simultaneous trace detection and quantification of 14 PFASs in foods of animal origin, verified through the analysis of 63 food samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.