ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
The Effect of Tool Geometry on the Strength of FSW Aluminum Thin Sheets.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Welding tools of different designs have been used to join friction stir welding 2-mm-thick Al 7075 sheets, to investigate the effect of the tool geometry on the weld performance. Five cylindrical tools with different pin geometries were manufactured from heat-treatable low alloy steel WNr 1.6582/DIN 34CrNiMo6. Additionally, the effect of the welding speed was considered in the work, with six different speeds ranging from 80 mm/min to 300 mm/min. The weld tool rotational speed was kept constant at 1000 rpm and all other parameters were also kept constant in the experiments. The tensile strength was measured to investigate the mechanical properties of the weld. Results were processed with statistical analysis tools, which showed that the mechanical strength was affected by tool geometry as well as welding speed. The weld tool with the highest pin diameter achieved the highest tensile strength. The welding speed affected the tensile strength differently in the different weld tool geometries studied. The highest weld efficiency reported in the tests is 72.20%, achieved with a cylindrical pin weld tool at 250 mm/min.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.